The manifestations of rational practice in Islamic thought: between Aristotelian and Greek influences such as Averroes (Ibn Rušd), Ibn Ḥazm and Algacel (al-Ġazzālī) and Ibn Taymiyya's endeavour to base his logical theory on pragmatic principles.
Downloads
- PDF (Español (España)) 181
- EPUB (Español (España)) 33
- VISOR (Español (España))
- MOVIL (Español (España))
- XML (Español (España)) 35
Info
Abstract
This article sheds light on the manifestations of rational practice in Islamic thought between the Aristotelian and Greek influence embodied by the theoretical efforts of the thinkers and philosophers of Islam and al-Andalus such as Averroes (Ibn Rušd), Ibn Ḥazm and Algacel (al - Ġazzālī), and highlights the efforts to establish the roots of the practice of reasoning in Islamic thought through the efforts of Ibn Taymiyya which his logical theory is based on pragmatic principles.
Keywords
Downloads
How to Cite
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have publications with this journal, accept the following terms:
a. Authors may retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons that allows third parties to share the work as long as its author is indicated. and its first publication this journal.
b. Authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the version of the published work (eg: deposit it in an institutional electronic file) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
c. Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (eg: in institutional telematic files or on their website) once the manuscript is accepted, which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See El efecto del acceso abierto).
References
ARISTOTE 1991, Rhétorique, introduction de Michel Meyer; traduction de C.-E. Ruelle; revue par P. Vanhemelryck; commentaires de B. Timmermans, Paris: Librairie Générale Française (Le livre de poche. Classiques de la philosophie).
BLANCHE, Robert, 1973, Le Raisonnement, Paris: PUF.
CARRILHO Manuel Maria, 1992, Rhétoriques de la modernité, Paris: PUF. JACOB, Pierre, 1980, L’empirisme logique. Ses antécédents ses critiques, Paris:
Les Éditions de Minuit.
KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI, Catherine, 1986, L’implicite, Paris: Armand Colin. LATRAVERSE, François, 1987. La pragmatique : Histoire et critique, Bruxelles:
Pierre Mardaga.
MEYER, Michel (éd.), 1986, De la métaphysique à la rhétorique. Essais à la mémoire de Chaïm Perelman avec un inédit sur la logique, Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
MEYER, Michel, 1986, De la problématologie: Philosophie , science et langage, Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga.
MEYER, Michel, 1993, Questions de rhétorique : langage , raison et seduction, Paris: Librairie Général Française.
PARRET, H. & al. 1980. Le langage en contexte. Études philosophiques et linguistiques de pragmatique, Amsterdam: John Benjamins P.C.
PERELMAN, Chaïm et Lucie OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, 1958, Traité de l’argumen- tation : La nouvelle rhétorique, Paris: PUF.
REBOUL, Olivier, 1991, Introduction à la rhétorique, Paris: PUF.
ROBRIEUX, Jean-Jacques, 1993: Eléments de rhétorique et d’argumentation,
Paris: Dunod.