Pre-entry screening and border procedures as new detention landscape in the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum. The Spanish borders as a laboratory for immobility policies
Info
Authors
- Gustavo de la Orden Bosch (ES) Instituto de Derechos Humanos Pedro Arrupe, Universidad de Deusto
Abstract
The paper analyses the Screening Proposal presented by the European Commission as part of the New Pact on Migration and Asylum. The aim is to clarify what would be new and old in the EU's legal framework and practices at the external borders, focusing mainly on immigration detention. In particular, the study addresses possible changes and continuities in detention policies. The research conducts a legal analysis aimed at determining the level of legal certainty and identifying legal loopholes and shortcomings. In order to contrast the results of the analysis, the study focuses on the Spanish legal system on border and migration control. Specifically, the study analyses the impact of an eventual adoption of the Screening Proposal on the Spanish border detention system. As a result, the research highlights that the current detention mechanisms in Spain already fulfil the functions pursued by the screening and border procedures proposed as new in the Pact. Furthermore, the approval of the Screening Proposal would entail constitutional and legal amendments that would reduce the scope of migrants' human rights and procedural guarantees at Spanish borders. The paper argues that, if the proposal is approved, screening and pre-entry border procedures still should meet a set of human rights basic standards and international obligations, according the current legal framework and the case-law of regional courts.
Keywords
Downloads
How to Cite
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Es condición para la publicación que el autor o autores ceda(n) a la Revista, en exclusiva, los derechos de reproducción. Paix et Sécurité Internationales es una revista que proporciona un acceso abierto inmediato a su contenido totalmente gratuito para lectores como para los investigadores que pretendan publicar en ella, ya que no se realizan cobros por concepto de envío, procesamiento ni publicación. Los usuarios podrán leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o enlazar el texto completo de los artículos publicados, o utilizarlos para cualquier otro propósito, dentro de la legalidad vigente. Y podrán hacerlo sin coste alguno, y sin necesitad de solicitar permiso al editor a al autor. Todo ello de acuerdo con la definición de acceso abierto de la Iniciativa Acceso Abierto de Budapest.
References
ABRISKETA, J. “El Pacto Europeo sobre Migración y Asilo y el control previo a la entrada: ¿quid prodest?”, La Ley Unión Europea, Vol. 106, 2022, pp. 248-291.
ABRISKETA, J. “El Pacto Europeo sobre Migración y Asilo: hacia un marco jurídico aún más complejo”, in Abrisketa, J. (dir.) Políticas de asilo de la UE: Convergencias entre las dimensiones interna y externa, Thomson Reuters Aranzadi, Pamplona, 2021, pp. 307–355.
BARBERO, I. “Los Centros de Atención Temporal de Extranjeros como nuevo modelo de control migratorio: situación actual, (des)regulación jurídica y mecanismos de control de derechos y garantías”. Derechos y libertades. Revista de Filosofía del Derecho y derechos humanos, Vol. 45, 2020, pp. 267-302.
BRANDARIZ, J.A., “The removal of EU nationals: An unaccounted dimension of the European deportation apparatus”, Central and Eastern European Migration Review, Vol. 10, 2021, pp. 13-33.
BRANDARIZ, J.A.; FERNÁNDEZ-BESSA, C. “La crimigración en el contexto español: El creciente protagonismo de lo punitivo en el control migratorio”, in López-Sala, A. and Godenau, D. (eds.), Estados de contención, estados de detención: El control de la inmigración irregular en España, Anthropos, Barcelona, 2017, pp. 119-143.
CAMPESI, G., “The EU Pact on Migration and Asylum and the dangerous multiplication of ‘anomalous zones’ for migration management”, in Carrera, S. and Geddes, A. The EU Pact on Migration and Asylum in light of the United Nations Global Compact on Refugees, European University Institute, San Domenico di Fisiole, 2020, pp. 195-204.
CAMPESI, G., “Between containment, confinement and dispersal: The evolution of the Italian reception system before and after the ‘refugee crisis’”, Journal of Modern Italian Studies, Vol. 23, No. 4, 2018, pp. 494–506.
CAMPESI, G., CORNELISSE, G., The European Commission’s New Pact on Migration and Asylum. Horizontal Substitute Impact Assessment, European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), 2021.
CARRERA, S., “The Strasbourg Court judgment N.D. and N.T v Spain. A carte blanche to push backs at EU external borders?”, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2020/21, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Migration Policy Centre, 2020.
CORNELISSE, G., “Border control and the right to liberty in the Pact: A false promise of ‘certainty, clarity and decent Conditions’?”, in Thym, D. and Odysseus Academic Network (eds.). Reforming the Common European Asylum System. Opportunities, pitfalls, and downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2022, pp. 61-79.
CORNELISSE, G.; RENEMAN, M., “Border procedures in the Commission’s New Pact on Migration and Asylum: A case of politics outplaying rationality?”, European Journal Law, Vol. 26, No. 3-4, 2020, pp. 181-198.
DE LUCAS, J., “Déficits y falacias de la democracia liberal ante la gestión de la diversidad: El caso de las políticas migratorias y de asilo”, Deusto Journal of Human Rights¸ Vol. 1, 2016, pp. 15-37.
DEL VALLE GÁLVEZ, J.A., “Los refugiados, las fronteras exteriores y la evolución del concepto de frontera internacional”, Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, Vol. 55, 2016, pp. 759-777.
GARCÍA ANDRADE, P., “Extraterritorial strategies to tackle irregular immigration by sea: A Spanish perspective”, in Ryan, B. and Mitsilegas, V., Extraterritorial immigration control. Legal challenges, Brill, Leiden, 2010, pp. 311–346.
HATHAWAY, J.C., “Forced migration studies: Could we agree just to ‘date’?”, Journal of Refugee Studies, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2007, pp. 349–369.
Jakulevičienė, L., “Pre-screening at the border in the Asylum and Migration Pact: A paradigm shift for asylum, return and detention Policies?”, in THYM, D. and Odysseus Academic Network (eds.), Reforming the Common European Asylum System. Opportunities, pitfalls, and downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2022, pp. 81-97.
LÉONARD, S., KAUNERT, C., Refugees, security and the European Union, Routledge, London, 2019.
NAGORE CASAS, M., “The instruments of pre-border control in the EU: A new source of vulnerability for asylum seekers?”, Paix at Sécurité Internationales, Vol. 7, 2019, pp. 161-198.
RUIZ RAMOS, J., Asylum detention under the European Convention of Human Rights, Cuadernos Deusto de Derechos Humanos, Bilbao, 2022.
THYM, D., “Never ending story? Political dynamics, legislative uncertainties, and practical drawbacks of the ‘New’ Pact on Migration and Asylum”, in Thym, D. and Odysseus Academic Network (eds.), Reforming the Common European Asylum System. Opportunities, pitfalls, and downsides of the Commission Proposals for a New Pact on Migration and Asylum, Nomos, Baden-Baden, 2022, pp. 11-32.
VRADIS, A., PAPADA, E., PAINTER, J., PAPOUTSI, A., New borders: hotspots and the European migration regime, Pluto Press, London, 2019.