Western Sahara, a thorn in the EU’s side: analysis of the CJEU’S incoherent words to protect future EU-Morocco Agreements

Downloads

Article abstract page views:  32  

Info

Notes
Published: 21-01-2026

Authors

Abstract

On 4 October 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered three judgments concerning Western Sahara, joined cases C-779/21 P and C-799/21 P, joined cases C-778/21 P and C-798/21 P, and case C-399/22. The second of these judgments annulled the fisheries agreement between the EU and Morocco because of the lack of consent of the Saharawi people, as the Court found that the Saharawi territory was affected by this agreement. In principle, the judgement appears to be favourable to the Front POLISARIO, recognized as the legitimate representative of the Saharawi people. Nevertheless, at the same time it presents inconsistencies that may have negative consequences for the Saharawi people. The Court based its argument on the right to self-determination and the principle of the relative effects of treaties, recognizing the Saharawi people as a “third party” affected by the agreements between the EU and Morocco. However, the Court also introduced the concept of implied consent in case the agreement in question does not impose obligations on the people under occupation and provides them with benefits. This interpretation could lead to a weakening of the right to self-determination of the Saharawi people by not having to consult directly with the Front POLISARIO when concluding an agreement affecting the Saharan territory. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to analyse the legal arguments introduced by the Court in this matter that allow the occupying power, Morocco, to exploit the Saharawi natural resources without requiring the express consent of this people. It will also examine how the Court’s lack of clarity perpetuates the legal and political uncertainty surrounding trade relations between the EU and Morocco, jeopardising the peaceful and legal resolution of the conflict in Western Sahara.

Keywords


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Calles Gómez, S. (2026). Western Sahara, a thorn in the EU’s side: analysis of the CJEU’S incoherent words to protect future EU-Morocco Agreements. PEACE & SECURITY-PAIX ET SÉCURITÉ INTERNATIONALES (EuroMediterranean Journal of International Law and International Relations), (14). Retrieved from https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/paetsei/article/view/11661

Author Biography

Sara Calles Gómez, Universidad de Salamanca

Universidad de Salamanca

References

BÁRBULO, T., La historia prohibida del Sáhara Español. Las claves del conflicto que condiciona las relaciones entre España y el Magreb, Ed. Península, 2017.

BOUKHARI, A., “Las dimensiones internacionales del conflicto del Sáhara Occidental y sus repercusiones para una alternativa marroquí”, Real Instituto Elcano, nº 16, 2004.

CANNIZZARO, E., “The Value of the EU International Values”, in DOUMA, W.TH. (eds.), The Evolving Nature of EU External Relations Law, T.M.C. Asser Press: Conference paper, 2021.

CARROZZINI, A., “Working Its Way Back to International Law? The General Court’s Judgments in Joined Cases T-344/19 and T-356/19 and T-279/19 Front Polisario v Council”, European Paper, vol. 7, nº 1, 2022.

DAMIS, J., “The Western Sahara Conflict: Myths and Realities”, Middle East Journal, vol. 37, nº 2, 1983.

DÍEZ PERALTA, E., “El Sáhara Occidental: una piedra en el camino de la asociación privilegiada entre la Unión Europea y Marruecos”, LA LEY Unión Europea, nº 46, 2017.

FERRER LLORET, J., “El conflicto del Sáhara Occidental ante los Tribunales de la Unión Europea”, Revista General de Derecho Europeo, vol. 42, 2017.

FERNÁNDEZ MOLINA, I., Moroccan Foreign Policy under Mohammed VI, Durham Modern Middle East and Islamic World East Serie, Routledge, 2016

GONZÁLEZ VEGA, J.A., “Tres sentencias y un destino (confuso): las decisiones del tribunal de justicia de 4 de octubre de 2024 sobre el Sáhara Occidental”, La Ley: Unión Europea, nº 131, 2024.

GONZÁLEZ VEGA, J.A., “¿Retorno a la Historia? El Tribunal General de la UE ante el Acuerdo de Pesca UE-Marruecos de 2019”, Anuario español de derecho internacional, nº 38, 2022.

IGLESIAS BERLANGA, M., “El Acuerdo de Pesca entre la Unión Europea y el Reino de Marruecos y su Protocolo de Aplicación 2018-2022 a la luz de la última jurisprudencia del TJUE y del Derecho Internacional”, Dereito, vol. 28, nº 1, 2019.

JIMÉNEZ SÁNCHEZ, C., El conflicto del Sáhara Occidental: el papel del Frente POLISARIO, Tirant Lo Blanch, Fundación Universitaria Andaluza, 2015

LANE SCHEPPELE, K., VLADIMIROVICH KOCHENOV, D., and GRABOWSKA-MOROZ, B., “EU Values Are Law, after All: Enforcing EU Values through Systemic Infringement Actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union”, Yearbook of European Law, vol. 39, nº 1, 2020.

LIPPERT, A., “Emergence or Submergence of a Potential State: The Struggle in Western Sahara”, Indiana University Press, vol. 24, nº 1, 1977.

LOVATT, H., and MUNDY, J., “Free to choose: A new plan for peace in Western Sahara”, European Council on Foreign Relations, 26 May 2021.

MARTÍN Y PÉREZ DE NANCLARES, J., “La Unión Europea como comunidad de valores: a vueltas con la crisis de la Democracia y el Estado de Derecho”, UNED. Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, nº 43, 2019.

MILANO, E., “Front Polisario and the Exploitation of Natural Resources by the Administrative Power”, European Papers, vol. 2, nº 3, 2017.

ODERMATT, J., “Whose Consent? On the Joined Cases C-779/21 P, Commission v Front Polisario and C-799/21 P, Council v Front Polisario”, Verfassungsblog on matters constitutional, 5 October 2024.

RUIZ GIMÉNEZ, E., “La posición de la Unión Europea en el conflicto del Sáhara Occidental. ¿Terminan los principios donde empiezan los intereses?”, Serie Unión Europea y Relaciones Internacionales, nº 117, 2022.

RUIZ MIGUEL, C., “La propuesta marroquí de autonomía para el Sáhara Occidental de 2007: una antigua propuesta sin credibilidad”, REAF, nº 7, 2008.

SAADOUN, S., “Responsible Business in Occupied Territories”, Human Rights Watch, 21 June 2016. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/06/21/responsible-business-occupied-territories.

SMITH, J.J., “The taking of the Sahara: the role of natural resources in the continuing occupation of Western Sahara”, Global Change Peace & Security, 2015.

SOROETA LICERAS, J., El conflicto del Sáhara Occidental, reflejo de las contradicciones y carencias del Derecho Internacional, Universidad del País Vasco, Servicio Editorial, 2001

SOROETA LICERAS, J., International Law and the Western Sahara Conflict, Wolf Legal Publisher, 2014

SOROETA LICERAS, J., “La cuestión de la legalidad de la explotación de los recursos del Sáhara Occidental ante el Tribunal de Justicia de la UE”, en MARTÍNEZ CAPDEVILA, C., and MARTÍNEZ PÉREZ, E.J. (dirs.), Retos para la acción exterior de la Unión Europea, 2017, pp. 79-80.

SOROETA LICERAS, J., “La jurisprudencia del TJUE en relación con la legalidad de la explotación de los recursos naturales del Sáhara Occidental o el dogma de la inmaculada legalidad de la acción exterior de la Unión Europea y sus consecuencias”, Revista General de Derecho Europeo, vol. 46, 2018.

SUÁREZ-COLLADO, Á. and CONTINI, D., “The European Court of Justice on the EU-Morocco agricultural and fisheries agreements: and analysis of the legal proceedings and consequences for the actors involved”, The Journal of North African Studies, 2021.

VON MASSOW, S., “Joined Cases C-779/21 P, Commission v Front Polisario and C-799/21 P, Council v Front Polisario: The Unresolved Contest Between ‘Benefits’ and ‘Consent’’, EJIL: Talk!, 23 October 2024.

WRANGE, P., “Western Sahara, the European Commission and the Politics of International Legal Argument”, en DUVAL, A., and KASSOTI, E. (eds.), Economic Activities in Occupied Territories: International, EU Law and Business and Human Rights Perspectives, London, Routledge, 2020,

ZOUBIR, Y.H., Conflict in Western Sahara. In Interpreting the Modern Middle East, Westview Press, 2010.