Recognition and understanding: two stages in the analysis of verbal irony
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2021.i29.06Info
Abstract
This paper is part of a larger research that aims to achieve a clear and consistent pragmatic characterisation of verbal irony. Critical review of the preceding approaches has shown their failure to define this phenomenon. Nevertheless, the irony as relevant innappropriateness theory (Attardo, 2000) and the speech act analysis of irony (Haverkate, 1985) have been identified as potentially valid to explain how irony is recognised and understood, respectively. What we present here are the most significant results obtained after confronting these theories with the samples of an oral corpus of ironies in Spanish produced by us. The analysis has allowed us to corroborate the suitability of its basis, in addition to raising new assumptions about what type of contextual information activates the recognition and what other modes of interpretation of the ironic statement can occur apart from the prototypical one consisting of a contrary meaning.
Keywords
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Laura de la Casa Gómez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
ATTARDO, S. (2000): “Irony as relevant inappropriateness”, Journal of Pragmatics, 32 (6), pp. 793-826.
AUSTIN, J. L. (1962): Cómo hacer cosas con palabras: palabras y acciones, Barcelona: Paidós, 2010.
DE LA CASA GÓMEZ, L. (2021): “Pragmática e ironía verbal: revisión crítica y claves teórico-metodológicas”, ELUA, 35, pp. 73-92.
FERNÁNDEZ GARCÍA, F. (2017): La descortesía en el debate electoral cara a cara, Sevilla: Editorial Universidad de Sevilla (Colección Lingüística).
GIBBS JR., R. W. (2000): “Irony in talk among friends”, Metaphor and Symbol, 15 (1/2), pp. 5-27.
GIBBS JR., R. W. y COLSTON, H. L. (2007): “The future of irony studies”, Gibbs Jr., R.W. y Colston, H.L. (eds.): Irony in Language and Thought: A cognitive Science Reader, Nueva York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 581-593.
HAVERKATE, H. (1985): “La ironía verbal: un análisis pragmalingüístico”, Revista Española de Lingüística, 15, pp. 343-391.
HAVERKATE, H. (1996): “Estrategias de cortesía. Análisis intercultural”, Celis, A. y Heredia, J. R. (coords.), Lengua y cultura en la enseñanza del español a extranjeros: Actas del VII Congreso Internacional de ASELE, Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, pp. 45-57, 1998.
KOTTHOFF, H. (2003): “Responding to irony in different contexts: on cognition in conversation, Journal of Pragmatics, 35 (9), pp. 1387-1411.
LEVINSON, S. C. (2000): Presumptive Meaning. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature, Cambridge/Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
NUOLIJÄRVI, P. y TIITTULA, L. (2011): “Irony in political television debates”, Journal of Pragmatics, 43, pp. 572-587.
RUIZ GURILLO, L. y Padilla García, X. A. (eds.) (2009): Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
SANTAMARÍA PÉREZ, I. (2009): “Los evidenciales”, Ruiz Gurillo, L. y Padilla García, X. A. (eds.): Dime cómo ironizas y te diré quién eres. Una aproximación pragmática a la ironía, Frankfurt: Peter Lang, pp. 267-292.
SEARLE, J. (1969): Actos de habla. Ensayo de filosofía del lenguaje, Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 2001.
SEARLE, J. R. (1979): Expression and Meaning, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
SPERBER, D. y WILSON, D. (1981): “Irony and the Use-mention Distinction”, Cole, P. (ed.): Radical Pragmatics, Nueva York: Academic Press, pp. 295-317.
SPERBER, D. y WILSON, D. (1986): Relevance. Communication and Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.
UTSUMI, A. (2000): “Verbal irony as implicit display of ironic environment: Distinguishing ironic utterances from nonirony”, Journal of Pragmatics, 32 (12), pp. 1777-1806.
WEIZMAN, E. (2013): “Political irony. Constructing reciprocal positioning in the news interview”, Fetzer, A. (ed.): Pragmatics of political discourse: Explorations across cultures, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 167-190.