Risk Pedagogies: scientific literacy in postpandemic times
Downloads
- PDF (Español (España)) 845
- EPUB (Español (España)) 30
- VISOR (Español (España))
- MÓVIL (Español (España))
- XML (Español (España)) 128
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i1.1301Info
Authors
- Liliana Valladares (MX) UNAM https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9616-7021
Abstract
En este artículo se describe en qué consiste la competencia en riesgo y se revisa su inclusión en la educación de ciencias. Se identifican y analizan las principales propuestas teórico-metodológicas, reportadas en la literatura especializada, para el tratamiento pedagógico del riesgo, y se discute su relación con los principales paradigmas teóricos que definen el riesgo. Se argumenta la pertinencia de incorporar el esquema SSI a las principales propuestas para la enseñanza del riesgo, y se plantea un metamodelo didáctico para facilitar la implementación de una pedagogía del riesgo en el aula de ciencias.
Palabras clave: Riesgo; Educación científica; Competencia en riesgo; Pedagogía del riesgo.
Risk Pedagogies: scientific literacy in pandemic times
Abstract: This article describes the risk competence and its inclusion in science education. The main theoretical-methodological proposals, reported in the specialized literature for the pedagogical treatment of risk, identified and analyzed, and their relationship with the main theoretical paradigms that define risk is discussed. The relevance of incorporating the SSI scheme into the main proposals for risk teaching is argued, and a didactic metamodel is proposed to facilitate the implementation of a risk pedagogy at the science school.
Keywords: Risk; Science education; Risk competence; Risk pegagogy.
Keywords
Downloads
Supporting Agencies
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Liliana Valladares
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process. This allow the / o authors / is non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons is available on flexible copyright licenses (Creative Commons).
Reconocimiento-NoComercial
CC BY-NC
References
Beck U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.
Bialostok S. (2015) Risk theory and education: Policy and practice. Policy Futures in Education 13 (5), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210315572519
Bialostok S. Whitman R. (2012) Education and the risk society: an introduction. En S. Bialostok,
R. Whitman, W. Bradley (Eds), Education and the Risk Society: Theories, Discourse and Risk Identities in Education Contexts (pp. 1–34). Rotterdam: Sense.
Christensen C. (2009) Risk and school science education. Studies in Science Education 45(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142293
Díaz, F. (2006) Enseñanza situada: vínculo entre la escuela y la vida. México: McGrawHill.
Eijkelhof H. (1986) Dealing with acceptable risk in science education: the case of ionizing radiation. Ethics and social responsibility in science education 2 (189), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-018-0763-4
FEM. (2019) Reporte de riesgos globales. Foro Económico Mundial. Recuperado de: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2019.pdf
Gordillo M. (2017) El enfoque CTS en la enseñanza de la ciencia y la tecnología. Asunción: Conacyt/OEI.
Hansen J., Hammann M. (2017) Risk in Science Instruction. The Realist and Constructivist Paradigms of Risk. Science & Education 26, 749–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9923-1
Howes R. (1975) Radiation risks—a possible teaching topic? Physics Education 10(6), 412-416.
Jasanoff S. (1999) The songlines of risk. Environmental Values 8 (2), 135-152.
Kolstø S. (2006) Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education 28 (14), 1689–1716. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560878
Lee H., Yoo J., Choi K., Kim S., Krajcik J., Herman B., Zeidler D. (2013) Socioscientific Issues as a Vehicle for Promoting Character and Values for Global Citizens, International Journal of
Science Education 35 (12) 2079-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
Levinson R. (2006) Towards a Theoretical Framework for Teaching Controversial Socio-scientific Issues. International Journal of Science Education 28 (10) 1201–1224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560753
Mack, O., Khare, A. (2016) Perspectives on a VUCA world. En O. Mack et al. (eds.) Managing in a VUCA world (pp. 3-19), Switzerland: Springer.
Martínez P., Díez F. (2020, 15 de abril) La crisis del coronavirus afecta a 1570 millones de estudiantes ¿cómo encarar el tsumani? The Conversation. Recuperado de: https://theconversation.com/amp/la-crisis-del-coronavirus-afecta-a-1-570-millones-de-estudiantes-como-encarar-el-tsunami-136408
Millar R. (2006) Twenty first Century science: insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education 28(13), 1499–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
Nikiforidou Z. (2017) Risk literacy: Concepts and pedagogical implications for early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 18 (3), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949117731027
Owens D., Sadler T., Zeidler D. (2017) Controversial issues in the science classroom. Phi Delta Kappan 99 (4), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717745544
Pedretti E., Nazir Y. (2011) Currents in STSE education: Mapping a complex field, Science Education 95(4), 601-626. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20435
Pedretti E., Nazir Y. (2016) Science, Technology and Society. En R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 932- 935), Dordrecht: Springer.
Ravetz J. (1997) Simple scientific truths and uncertain policy realities: implications for science education. Studies in Science Education, 30(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269708560101
Renn O. (1992) Concepts of risk: A classification. En S. Krimsky, D. Golding (Eds.) Social theories of risk (pp. 53–82). Westport: Praeger.
Riechard D. (1993) Risk literacy: Is it the missing link in environmental education? The Journal of Environmental Education 25(1), 8–12.
Rodríguez H. (2007) Dinámicas de constitución del riesgo: una propuesta composicional para gobernar el riesgo. Donostia: Universidad del País Vasco.
Ryder J. (2001) Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education 36 (1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260108560166
Sadler T. (2011) Socio-scientific Issues-Based Education: What We Know About Science Education in the Context of SSI. En T. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom (pp 355-369). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sadler T., Dawson V. (2012) Socio-scientific Issues in Science Education: Contexts for the Promotion of Key Learning Outcomes. En B.J. Fraser (Eds.), Second International Handbook of
Science Education (pp. 799- 809). Dordrecht: Springer.
Sadler T., Donnelly, L. (2006) Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality, International Journal of Science Education 28(12), 1463-1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717
Schenk L., Hamza K., Enghag M., Lundegård I., Arvanitis L., Haglund K., Wojcik A. (2019) Teaching and discussing about risk: seven elements of potential significance for science education, International Journal of Science Education 41 (9), 1271-1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1606961
Zeidler D, Herman B., Sadler T. (2019) New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 1, 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
Zeidler D. (2016) Socioscientific Issues. En R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 998-1002). Dordrecht: Springer.
Zeidler D., Nichols B. (2009) Socioscientific Issues: Theory and Practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49- 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
Zeidler D., Sadler T. (2011) An inclusive view of scientific literacy: core issues and future directions of socioscientific reasoning. En: C. Linder, L Ostman, D. Roberts, P. Wickman, G. Erickson, A MacKinnon (Eds.) Promoting scientific literacy: science education research in
transaction (pp 176–192). New York: Routledge.