La révélation de soi stratégique: guide pas a pas pour une communication romantique efficace
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2019.i27.16Info
Auteurs
- Oleksandra Romaniuk (UA) National University "Odessa Maritime Academy" https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0484-9653
Résumé
L’article se concentre sur la révélation de soi dans le discours romantique féminin à l’étape Pragmatique de la relation amoureuse. Pour augmenter les chances d'efficacité communicative, les moyens stratégiques sont explorés, à savoir ce qu'il faut dire (sémantique) et comment (les caractéristiques du discours et les moyens verbaux), ainsi que les causes des échecs de la communication féminine. Les moyens stratégiques sont mis en œuvre par le noyau central des Mouvements de communication féminins (événement mémorable, expérience de rencontre antérieure, louange à soi-même), fournissant une communication romantique interpersonnelle réussie. L’analyse présentée dans cette étude porte sur le corpus romantique féminin présenté par 738 mouvements de communication féminins visant à réaliser l’objectif de communication - éveiller l’intérêt du destinataire masculin en révélant intentionnellement des informations personnelles. La prise de conscience interculturelle de la communication romantique stratégique est bénéfique pour les locuteurs natifs, comme pour les locuteurs non natifs, permettant de surmonter facilement les barrières de communication et de développer la confiance en soi des partenaires romantiques en excluant les risques de rupture de la relation amoureuse.
Mots-clés
Téléchargements
Comment citer
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Oleksandra Romaniuk 2019
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Références
ALTMAN, I. & TAYLOR, D. (1973): Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationship. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
BROPHY-BAERMANN, M. (2005): "True Love on TV: A Gendered Analysis of Reality-Romance Television", Poroi 4(2), pp. 1751. https://doi.org/10.13008/ 2151-2957.1023
BROWN, G. & YULE, G. (1983): Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CB O9780511805226
COULTHARD, M. (1985): An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. NY; L.: Longman. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/97 81315835884
CRENSHAW, T. (1997): The Alchemy of Love and Lust: How our sex hormones influence our relationships. New York: Pocket Books.
CULPEPER, J. & HAUGH, M. (2014): Pragmatics and the English language. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/97 8-1-137-39391-3
DERLEGA, V. J., METTS, S., PETRONIO, S., & MARGULIS, S. T. (1993): Self-Disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
DEWAELE, J.-M. & SALOMIDOU, L. (2017): "Loving a partner in a Foreign Language", Journal of Pragmatics, 108, pp. 116-130. DIJK, T. (1981): Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
DONTCHEVA-NAVRATILOVA, O. & POVOLNÁ, R. (2012): “Introduction”, In Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. & Povolná , R. (eds.), Discourse Interpretation: Approaches and Applications, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. ix-xiii.
EDMONDSON, W. (1981): Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.
FERRIS, A., SMITH, S., GREENBERG, B. & SMITH, S. (2007): "The Content of Reality Dating Shows and Viewer Perceptions of Dating", Journal of Communication, 57(3), pp. 490-510.
FINKENAUER, C. & HAZAM, H. (2000): "Disclosure and secrecy in marriage: Do both contribute to marital satisfaction?", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, pp. 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500172005.
FISHER, H. (1994): Anatomy of Love. A natural history of mating, marriage, and why we stray. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
GREENE, K., DERLEGA, V. &MATHEWS, A. (2006): SelfDisclosure in Personal Relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GUMPERZ, J. (1982): Discourse Strategies. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HALL, A. (2005): Yes I Will Accept This Rose: Representation, Consumption, and Identity in ABC’s The Bachelor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
HARGIE, O. (2006): The handbook of communication skills. London: Routledge.
HARGIE, O. (2011): Skilled Interpersonal Interaction: Research, Theory, and Practice. London: Routledge.
HENDRICK, S. S., & HENDRICK, C. (1987): "Love and sexual attitudes, Self-Disclosure and sensation seeking", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(3), pp. 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540758700400303.
HINDE, R. A. (1997): Relationships: A dialectical perspective. East Sussex, UK: Erlbaum.
HOFFNER, C. & CANTOR, J. (1991): "Perceiving and responding to the mass media characters", in Bryant J. and Zillmann D. (eds), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 63-102.
JONES, R. (2013): Communication in the real world: an introduction to communication studies. Irvington, NY: Flat World Knowledge.
KNAPP, M. (1978): Social intercourse: From greeting to goodbye. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
LAKOFF, R. (1975): Language and woman's place. Harper and Row. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051
LOCHER, M. & GRAHAM, S. (2010): Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton.
LOCHER, M. (2015): "Interpersonal pragmatics and its link to (im)politeness research", Journal of Pragmatics, 86, pp. 5-10.
LORENZO-DUS, N. & GARCÉS-CONEJOS BLITVICH, P. (eds.) (2013): Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137313461
MEEKS, B. S., SUSAN S., & HENDRICK, C. (1998): "Communication, love and relationship satisfaction", Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6), pp. 755-773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02 65407598156003
MURSTEIN, B. I., & ADLER, E. R. (1995): "Gender differences in power and Self-Disclosure in dating and married couples", Personal Relationships, 2(3), pp. 199-209. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995. tb00086.x.
O’DRISCOLL, J. (2013): "The role of language in interpersonal pragmatics", Journal of Pragmatics, 58, pp. 170-181.
POPULARITY OF REALITY TV GENRES IN THE U.S. (2016): In: The Statistics Portal. Online document. 2 May 2017. https://www.statista.com/statistics/617828/popularity-reality-tv-genres-usa/.
ROMANIUK, A. (2017): "Basic universal units and components of romantic discourse based on the dating show patterns of dyadic interaction", Analele Universităţii din Craiova, Seria Stiinte Filologice, Lingvistica, 1-2, EUC, Editura Universitaria, pp. 370380.
ROMANIUK, O. (2018): "Feminine contact-establishing communicative tactic within the framework of romantic discourse", Analele Universităţii din Craiova, Seria Stiinte Filologice, Lingvistica, 1-2, EUC, Editura Universitaria, pp. 170-181.
RUBIN R. B., MCHUGH, M. (1987): "Development of parasocial interaction relationships", Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 31, pp. 279-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08 838158709386664
SACKS, H., SCHEGLOFF, E. & JEFFERSON, G. (1974): "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation", Language, 50(4), pp. 696–735. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412243
SCHIFFRIN, D. (2000): Approaches to Discourse Text. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
SPRECHER, S., & HENDRICK, S. S. (2004): "Self-Disclosure in Intimate Relationships: Associations with Individual and Relationship Characteristics Over Time", Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(6), pp. 857-877. https://doi.org/ 10.1521/jscp.23.6.857.54803.
STEWART, J., ZEDIKER, K AND WITTEBORN, S. (2005): Together: communicating interpersonally a social construction approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
STUBBS, M. (1983): Discourse analysis: the sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Blackwell.
TANNEN, D. (1996): Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press. TAYLOR, D. (1968): "The Development of Interpersonal Relationships: Social Penetration Processes", The Journal of Social Psychology, 75(1), pp. 79-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00 224545.1968.9712476
WEISS, G. & WODAK, R. (2003): Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Palgrave.