Semiosis iconique dans le developpement du langage de l'enfant
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2020.iextra2.11Info
Auteurs
- Miguel González Pereira (ES) Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
Résumé
Plusieurs articles récents affirment la pertinence de l'iconique dans l'acquisition linguistique, mais l'iconicité est généralement identifiée comme une relation de similitude entre l'expression et le contenu, se référant ainsi à une vision simplificatrice de la doctrine de Peirce. L'objet de la sémiotique de Peirce n'est pas les signes mais la sémiose comme seul processus possible de représentation cognitive. Il distingue ainsi trois catégories phénoménologiques, dont la première (Firstness) est liée à la sémiose iconique basée sur les qualités de la perception. Dans cet article, nous proposons une lecture de Peirce qui répond à sa vision de l'iconisme comme fondement de toute sémiose et nous passons en revue les approches récentes de l'iconicité. Cette vision de l'iconicité est projetée à l'analyse des particularités des processus phoniques et du rôle des répétitions dans le langage des enfants par l'exploitation du corpus Koiné, et nous suggérons son éventuelle pertinence pour la linguistique clinique.
Mots-clés
Téléchargements
Comment citer
Licence
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Références
CP: PEIRCE, C. S. (1931-1935): The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. I-VI, Hartshorne, Ch. & Weiss, P. (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Vols. VII-VIII, Burks, A. W. (1958) (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
ECO, U. (1975): Trattato di semiotica generale, Milano: Bompiani. Trad. cast. de C. Manzano, Tratado de semiótica general, Barcelona: Lumen, 1977.
ECO, U. (1992): La production des signes, Paris: Librairie Générale Française.
ECO, U. (1997): Kant e l’ornitorrinco, Milano: R.C.S. Libri. Trad. cast. de H. Lozano, Kant y el ornitorrinco, Barcelona: Lumen, 1999.
FERNÁNDEZ LÓPEZ, I. y PREGO, G. (2014): “Exploración lingüística del habla infantil”, Fernández Pérez, M. (coord.): Lingüística y déficit comunicativos, Madrid: Síntesis, pp. 45-99.
FERNÁNDEZ PÉREZ, M. (2014): “Roman Jakobson y su contribución al estudio del lenguaje peculiar”, Calero, Mª L. et al. (eds.): Métodos y resultados actuales en Historiografía de la Lingüística, Münster: Nodus Publikationen, pp. 193-203.
GALLESE, V. & LAKOFF, G. (2005): “The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge”, Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22 (3/4), pp. 455–479.
GIVÓN, T. (1985): “Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax”, Haiman, J. (ed.): Iconicity in Syntax, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 187-220.
GLENBERG, A. M. & GALLESE, V. (2012): “Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension and production”, Cortex, 48 (7), pp. 905-922.
GOMILA, T. & CALVO, P. (2008): “Directions for an Embodied Cognitive Science: Toward an Integrated Approach”, Gomila, T. & Calvo, P. (eds.): Handbook of Cognitive Science. An embodied approach, Oxford/Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 1-25.
GONZÁLEZ PEREIRA, M. (2018): “Aproximación semiótica al desarrollo del lenguaje infantil en edad temprana”, Díaz, M. et al. (eds.), Actas do XIII Congreso Internacional de Lingüística Xeral, Vigo: Universidade de Vigo, pp. 439-446.
HAIMAN, J. (1980): “The Iconicity of Grammar: Isomorphism and Motivation”, Language, 56 (3), pp. 515-540.
IMAI, M. & KITA S. (2014): “The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 20130298.
JAKOBSON, R. (1941): Kindersprache, Aphasie und Allgemeine Lautgesetze, Uppsala: Universitets Arsskrift. Trad. cast. de E. Benítez (sobre versión francesa), Lenguaje infantil y afasia, Madrid: Ayuso.
KÖHLER, W. (1929): Gestalt Psychology. New York: Liveright.
LAING, C. et al. (2017): “How sa-lient are onomatopoeia in the early input? A prosodic analysis of infant-directed speech”, Journal of Child Language, 44, pp. 1117-1139.
METEYARD, L. & VIGLIOCCO, G. (2008): “The Role of Sensory and Motor Information in Semantic Representation: A Review”, Gomila, T. & Calvo, P. (eds.): Handbook of Cognitive Science. An embodied approach, Oxford/Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 293-312
METEYARD et al. (2012): “Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics”, Cortex, 48, pp. 788-804.
METEYARD et al. (2015): “When semantics aids phonology: A processing advantage for iconic word forms in aphasia”, Neuropsychologia, 76, pp. 264-275.
OZTURK et al. (2013): “Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-months-olds”, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, pp. 173-186.
PERNISS, P. et al. (2010): “Iconi-city as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages”, Frontiers in Psychology 1, pp. 1-15.
PERNISS P. & VIGLIOCCO G. (2014): “The bridge of iconicity: from a world of experience to the experience of language”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369, 20140179.
PHARIES, D. (1985): Charles S. Peirce and the linguistic sign, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
PIAGET, J. (1959): La formation du symbole chez l’enfant. Neuchatel: Delachaux & Niestlé.
RICHARDSON, M. J. et al. (2008): “Ecological Psychology: Six Principles for an Embodied–Embedded Approach to Behavior”, Gomila, T. & Calvo, P. (eds.): Handbook of Cognitive Science. An embodied approach, Oxford/Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 161-187.
SAPIR, E. (1929): “A study in phonetic symbolism”, Journal of Experimental Psychology 12, pp. 225-239.
SLOBIN, D. (1985): “The child as a linguistic icon-maker”, Haiman, J. (ed.): Iconicity in Syntax, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 221-248.
SONESSON, G. (2008): “Prolegomena to a general theory of iconicity considerations on language, gesture, and pictures”, Klaas Willems, K. & De Cuypere, L. (eds.): Naturalness and Iconicity in Language, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 47-72.
SONESSON, G. (2013). “The natural history of branching: approaches to the phenomenology of firstness, secondness, and thirdness”, Signs and Society, 1 (2), pp. 297-326.
TOLAR, T. et al. (2008): “The development of the ability to recognize the meaning of iconic signs”, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13, pp. 225-240.
TOMASELLO, M. (2003): Constructing a language, Cambridge (MA): Harvard Univ. Press.
VAN LIER, L. (2004): The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning. A Sociocultural Perspective, Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers.