The teaching-learning process to be tested in the era of academic integrity (AI1) x artificial intelligence (AI2)
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Tavira.2025.i30.1102Info
Authors
- Cynthia Potvin (CA) Université de Moncton https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2390-2950
Abstract
While Higher Education institutions aim students to develop the concept of academic integrity (AI1), the arrival of artificial intelligence tools (AI2) like ChatGPT puts the process of teaching-learning to test. Respective to teachers, they must inculcate ethical values while students are confronted with a great deal of factors that influence them during their academic writings. Given this situation, the main objective of this article is to determine the competencies that must be developed in this era of continued immersion in AI2 to guarantee AI1. To do so, the results of a quantitative descriptive analysis of the relevant sections and questions from questionnaires of the faculty (1357 participants) and the students (4664 participants) who participated in this first data collection of the study by Partnership on University Plagiarism Prevention (PUPP), conducted in 2023, will be used to apply them to the discipline of Spanish as a foreign language (SFL). The conclusion will be that, to accomplish their respective tasks, it is necessary that faculty and students work hand in hand.Keywords
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cynthia Potvin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who have publications with this journal agree to the following terms:
- They will retain their copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License. They may copy, use, disseminate, transmit, and publicly display, provided that authorship, url, and journal are cited, and they are not used for commercial purposes. Derivative works are not permitted.
You may adopt other non-exclusive licensing arrangements for distribution of the published version of the work (e.g. deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
Disseminate your work on the Internet (e.g. in institutional telematic archives or on your website), which can lead to interesting exchanges and increase citations of the published work. (See The Open Access Effect)
References
Consejo de Europa. (2001). Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas: aprendizaje, enseñanza, evaluación. Servicio de publicaciones del Consejo de Europa. https://bit.ly/44GHsMH
Consejo de Europa. (2020). Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas: aprendizaje, enseñanza, evaluación. Volumen complementario. Estrasburgo: Servicio de publicaciones del Consejo de Europa. www.coe.int/lang-cefr
Desinova-Schmidt, E. (2024). Academic integrity and international students: An inclusive approach. En S. E. Eaton (Ed.), Second Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 1187-1200). Springer.
Freeman, J. (2024). Provide or punish? Students’ views on generative AI in higher education. HEPI Policy notes 51. Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI). https://bit.ly/3TiM6du
Gregersen, E. (2025). ChatGPT software. Encyclopaedia Britannica.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/ChatGPT
Instituto Cervantes. (2007). Plan curricular del Instituto Cervantes Niveles de referencia para el español. Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca Nueva, S. L..
Mendes Rodrigues, M. M.a, Silva, R., Borges A. P., Franco M. y Oliveira, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence: threat or asset to academic integrity” A bibliometric analysis. Kybernetes. DOI 10.1108/K-09-2023-1666
Moreno Fernández, F. (2018). Las competencias clave del profesorado de lenguas segundas y extranjeras. Instituto Cervantes. https://bit.ly/4lwbCI3
Niel, X. y Roux, D. (2010). Introduction. La révolution internet. Les 100 mots de l’internet (p. 3-10). Presses Universitaires de France.
Paivandi, S. y Espinosa, G. (2013). Les TIC et la relation entre enseignants et étudiants à l’université. Distances et médiations des savoirs, 4. https://bit.ly/46jCIOf
Peters, M. (2021). Modèle sur les stratégies de créacollage numérique. Demande de subvention de partenariat soumise au CRSH/Partnership grant application submitted to SSHRC. https://mpeters.uqo.ca/ateliers-workshops/
Peters, M. (2015). Enseigner les stratégies de créacollage numérique pour éviter le plagiat au secondaire. Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 38(3), 1-28. https://bit.ly/3GkTdzc
PUPP (2022). Objectives. PUPP. https://bit.ly/3GkBdVD
Rabadán Zurita, M. (2025, 4 de marzo). ¿Cómo aplican los docentes de lenguas extranjeras las herramientas de la inteligencia artificial en sus clases? Una revisión sistemática.
[Ponencia]. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (virtual), México D.F., México.
UNESCO (2023a). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms?. París: UNESCO. https://bit.ly/466u9GP
UNESCO (2023b). Résumé du rapport mondial de suivi sur l’éducation 2023 : Les technologies dans l’éducation : Qui est aux commandes?. París: UNESCO. https://bit.ly/4esc9J1
Université de Moncton (UdeM). (2025a). 10.9.3 Fraude. Répertoire universitaire. UdeM. https://www.umoncton.ca/repertoire/reglements
Université de Moncton (UdeM). (2025b). IA et vos plans de cours. UdeM. https://bit.ly/44cVWnC
Valerio, C. (2024). Inteligencia artificial y enseñanza de idiomas. British Council Spain. https://bit.ly/4nsmCbo
Verdia. A. (2019). Desarrollo profesional. En Muñoz-Bassols, J., Gironzetti, E. y Lacorte, M. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Spanish language teaching (pp. 667-680). Routledge.
Vez, J. M. (2015). 50 años enseñando lenguas extranjeras (1965-2015): ¿Qué no hemos hecho bien? [Conferencia plenaria]. Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.