Modal Subjectivity and types: an empirically motivated acount.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2000.i8.07Información
Autores/as
- José María García Núñez (ES) Universidad de Cádiz
Resumen
El presente trabajo examina la relación entre subjetividad (en tanto que orientación al hablante) y tipología modal (dinámica, deóntica, epistémica). La revisión de las dos propuestas teóricas más significativas al respecto ofrece una base sobre la que construir un procedimiento capaz de determinar con precisión los límites extensionales de la subjetividad modal y su distribución en relación con los distintos tipos modales.
Palabras clave
Descargas
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2018 Pragmalingüística
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Citas
ANTINUCI, F. and D. PARISI (1971), "On English modal verbs". Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, University of Chicago, pp. 28-39.
BERBEIRA GARDON, J.L. (1996), Los Verbos Modales Ingleses: Estudio Semántico- Pragmático, Cádiz. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz.
COATES, J. (1983). The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries, London, Croom Helm.
GARCÍA NÚÑEZ, J.M. (1999), Semántica de los Adverbios Temo-Dependientes del Inglés Actual, Cádiz, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cádiz.
GARCÍA NÚÑEZ. J.M. (forthcoming) "Adverb. Orientation: semantics and pragmatics". to appear in Actas de ELIA V Pragmática: teoria y práctica.
GROEFSEMA, M. (1992), "Can you pass the salt?: a short-circuited implicature?", Lingua 87, 103-135.
GROEFSEMA, M. (1995), "Can, may, must and should: a Relevance-theoretic approach". Journal of Linguistics 31, 53-79.
HAEGEMAN, L. (1983). The Semantics of Will in Present-Day English: a Unified Account. Brussels, Verhandeling Letteren.
HAEGEMAN, L. (1989) "Be going to and will: a pragmatic account". Journal of Linguistics 25. 291-317.
HALLIDAY. M.A.K. (1970). "Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English", Foundations of Language 6. 322-361.
HOFFMAN, T.R. (1976), "Past tense replacement and the modal system", in MCCAWLEY, J.D. (ed), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 7, New York, Academic Press. pp. 85-101.
INFANTIDOU-TROUKI, E. (1993), "Sentential adverbs and relevance". Lingua 90, 69- 90.
LANG, E. (1979), "Zum status der satzadverbiale Slovo a Slovenost 40, 200-213.
LANGACKER, R. (1990), "Subjectification", Cognitive Linguistics 1-1, 5-38
LANGACKER, R. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Part II, Stanford. Stanford University Press.
LEECH, G (1971). Meaning and the English Verb, London, Longman.
LYONS, J. (1977), Semantics, Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
NAKAMURA. W. (1997). "A Cognitive Approach to English Adverbs", Linguistics 35. 247-287.
NUYTS, J. (1993). "Epistemic modal adverbs and adjectives and the layered representation of conceptual and linguistic structure", Linguistics 31. 933-969.
PALMER, F. (1974), The English Verb, London. Longman.
PALMER. F. (1986), Mood and Modality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
PELIVÁS. P. (1996). Subjectivity in English. Generative Granimar Versus the Cognitive Theory of Epistemic Grounding, Frankfurt am Main. Peter Lang.
PERKINS. M. (1983), Modal Expressions in English, London. Francis Pinter.
PULLUM, G. AND D. WILSON (1977). "Autonomous syntax and the analysis of auxiliaries". Language 53. 441-788.
ROSS, J. R. (1969), "Auxiliaries as Main Verbs", in Todd, W. (ed.), Studies in Philosophical Linguistics, Evanston 111. Great Expectations Press.
SEARLE, J. R. (1983), Intentionality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
SWEETSER, E. (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
TALMY, L. (1988), "Force dynamics in language and cognition", Cognitive Science 2. 49-100.
VON WRIGHT, E.H. (1951), An Essay in Modal Logic, Amsterdam, North Holland.
WALTON A.L. (1988) The Pragmatics of English Modal Verbs, Ph.D. thesis, University of London.