Aplicaciones de la neurofisiología cognitiva y la estimulación cerebral no invasiva al estudio del lenguaje
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2020.i28.10Información
Autores/as
- Florencia Sanmartino (ES) Universidad de Cádiz https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0651-8890
- Javier J. González-Rosa (ES) Universidad de Cádiz
Resumen
Los potenciales relacionados con eventos (ERP) son un método de evaluación y de mapeo cerebral que permite entender la dinámica temporal del procesamiento de la información, dotando a la neurociencia de una herramienta de gran valor para escudriñar el procesamiento del lenguaje en niños y adultos, así como en trastornos cerebrales. Su uso está permitiendo comprender con precisión aquellos marcadores cerebrales involucrados en aspectos tan importantes como la adquisición del lenguaje o la integración y los desajustes semánticos y sintácticos. Por otra parte, el empleo de técnicas de estimulación cerebral no invasivas está suponiendo una auténtica revolución en el estudio del lenguaje; es una potente herramienta para la evaluación de aquellas redes cerebrales que lo facilitan o lo inhiben y permite mejorar o corregir sustancialmente el aprendizaje y el rendimiento en pruebas de lectura y comprensión o recuerdo, tanto en población sana como en tratamientos rehabilitadores en población clínica.
Palabras clave
Descargas
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Florencia Sanmartino , Javier J. González-Rosa
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Citas
BARKER, A. T. et al. (1985): “Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex”, The Lancet, 325(8437), pp. 1106-1107.
BARWOOD, C. H. et al. (2013): “Long term language recovery subsequent to low frequency rTMS in chronic non-fluent aphasia”, NeuroRehabilitation, 32(4), pp. 915-928.
BESTMANN, S. (2008): “The physiological basis of transcranial magnetic stimulation”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(3), pp. 81-83.
BRESSLER, S. L. & DING, M. (2006): “Event-Related Potentials”, Akay, M. (ed.): Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 1-8.
CARRETIÉ, L. & IGLESIAS, J. (2008): Psico-fisiología: Fundamentos metodológi-cos, Madrid: Pirámide.
CATTANEO, L. (2013): “Language”, Lozano, A. M. & Hallett, M. (eds.): Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 116, pp. 681-691.
CATTANEO, Z. et al. (2011): “Transcranial direct current stimulation over Broca’s region improves phonemic and semantic fluency in healthy individuals”, Neuroscience, 183, pp. 64–70.
CEPONIENE, R. et al. (2003): “Speech–sound-selective auditory impairment in children with autism: They can perceive but do not attend”, Proceed-ings of the National Academy of Sci-ences, 100(9), pp. 5567-5572.
CHEN, A. et al. (2016): “Auditory ERP response to successive stimuli in infancy”, PeerJ, 4, pp. 1580.
COHEN KADOSH, R. et al. (2010): “Modu-lating neuronal activity produces specific and long-lasting changes in numerical competence”, Current Bi-ology, 20(22), pp. 2016-2020.
COSTANZO, F. et al. (2016): “Reading changes in children and adolescents with dyslexia after transcranial direct current stimulation”, Neuroreport, 27(5), pp. 295-300.
COULSON, S. et al. (1998): “Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain re-sponse to morphosyntactic viola-tions”, Language and Cognitive Pro-cesses, 13(1), pp. 21-58.
DE VRIES, M. H. et al. (2010): “Electrical stimulation of Broca’s area enhances implicit learning of an artificial grammar”, Journal of Cognitive Neu-roscience, 22(11), pp. 2427–2436.
FLÖEL, A. et al. (2008): “Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning”, Journal of Cognitive Neu-roscience, 20(8), pp. 1415–1422.
FRAGA GONZÁLEZ, G. et al. (2017): “Contributions of letter-speech sound learning and visual print tuning to reading improvement: evidence from brain potential and dyslexia training studies”, Brain Sciences, 7, pp. 10.
FRIEDERICI, A. D. (2002): “Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), pp. 78–84.
FRIEDERICI, A. D. et al. (2007): “Brain responses in 4-month-old infants are already language specific”, Current Biology, 17(14), pp. 1208-1211.
FRIEDERICI, A. D. et al. (2002): “Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflect-ing aspects of syntactic complexity and syntactic repair”, Journal of Psy-cholinguistic Research, 31(1), pp. 45-63.
FRIEDERICI, A. D. et al. (1993): “Event-related brain potentials during natural speech processing: effects of semantic, morphological and syntactic violations”, Cognitive Brain Research, 1(3), pp. 183-192.
FRISCH, S. et al. (2002): “The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity”, Cognition, 85(3), pp. B83-92.
FRISCH, S. & SCHLESEWSKY, M. (2001): “The N400 reflects problems of the-matic hierarchizing”, NeuroReport, 12(15), pp. 3391–3394.
GARRIDO-VÁSQUEZ, P. et al. (2013): “An ERP study of vocal emotion pro-cessing in asymmetric Parkinson’s disease”, Social Cognitive and Affec-tive Neuroscience, 8(8), pp. 918-927.
GOUGH, P. M. et al. (2005): “Dissociating linguistic processes in the left inferior frontal cortex with transcranial magnetic stimulation”, Journal of Neuroscience, 25(35), pp. 8010-8016.
GUNTER, T. C. et al. (2000): “Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs reveal early autonomy and late interaction”, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), pp. 556-568.
HAMILTON, R. H. et al. (2011): “Mecha-nisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulation”, Brain and Lan-guage, 118(1-2), pp. 40-50.
HARTWIGSEN, G. et al. (2010): “The right posterior inferior frontal gyrus contributes to phonological word decisions in the healthy brain: Evidence from dual-site TMS”, Neuropsychologia, 48(10), pp. 3155-3163.
KAAN, E. et al. (2000): “The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty”, Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(2), pp. 159-201.
KAPOOR, A. (2017): “Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy for post-stroke non-fluent aphasia: A critical review”, Topics in Stroke Re-habilitation, 24(7), pp. 547-553.
KUTAS, M. & FEDERMEIER, K.D. (2000): “Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language compre-hension”, Trends in Cognitive Sci-ences, 4 (12), pp. 463-470.
KUTAS, M. & HILLYARD, S.A. (1984): “Brain potential during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic associa-tion”, Nature, 307, pp. 161-163.
KUTAS, M. & HILLYARD, S.A. (1980): “Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity”, Science, 207 (4427), pp. 203-205.
LAI, V. T. et al. (2009): “Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: an ERP study”, Brain Research, 1284, pp. 145-155.
LANG, N. et al. (2004): “Effects of transcrani-al direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospi-nal and transcallosal excitability”, Experimental Brain Research, 156(4), pp. 439–443.
MEINZER, M. et al. (2013): “Anodal tran-scranial direct current stimulation temporarily reverses age-associated cognitive decline and functional brain activity changes”, Journal of Neuroscience, 33(30), pp. 12470-12478.
MENDOZA, J. A. et al. (2016): “Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in aphasia and communication im-pairment in post-stroke: systematic review of literature”, Journal of Neu-rology & Translational Neuroscience, 4, pp. 2333–7087.
MONTI, A. et al. (2008): “Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia”, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychia-try, 79(4), pp. 451-453.
MORGAN-SHORT, K. (2014): “Electrophysi-ological approaches to understand-ing second language acquisition: A field reaching its potential”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, pp. 15-36.
NÄÄTÄNEN, R. (2003): “Mismatch negativi-ty: clinical research and possible ap-plication”, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 48(2), pp. 179-188.
NEVILLE, H. J. et al. (1991): “Syntactically based sentence processing classes: evidence from event-related brain po-tentials”, Journal of Cognitive Neuro-science, 3(2), pp. 151-165.
NEVLER, N. & ASH, E. L. (2015): “TMS as a Tool for Examining Cognitive Processing”, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 15(8), p. 52.
NIEDERMEYER, E. & LOPES DA SILVA, F. (1999): Electroencephalography: Basic principles, clinical applications and related fields, Philadelphia: Lip-pincott Williams & Wilkins.
NITSCHE, M. A. & PAULUS, W. (2000): “Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak tran-scranial direct current stimulation”, The Journal of physiology, 527(3), pp. 633.
OSTERHOUT, L. et al. (1994): “Brain poten-tials elicited by garden-path sentenc-es: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learn-ing, Memory and Cognition, 20(4), pp. 786-803.
PARISE, E. et al. (2010): “Did You Call Me? 5-Month-Old infants own name guides their attention”, PLoS One, 5(12), pp. e14208.
PASCUAL-LEONE, A. et al. (2000): “Tran-scranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience-virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional con-nectivity”, Current Opinion in Neuro-biology, 10(2), pp. 232-237.
PICTON, T. W. & HILLYARD, S. A. (1988): “Endogenous event-related poten-tials”, PICTON, T. W. (ed.): Handbook of electroencephalography and clini-cal neurophysiology (Vol 3). Human event-related potentials, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 361-425.
PIZZAGALLI, D. A. (2007): “Electroenceph-alography and high-density electro-physiological source localization”, Cacioppo, J. T., Tass-Inary, L. G. & Berntson, G. G. (eds.): Handbook of psychophysiology, Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press, pp. 56-84.
POLICH, J. & HERBST, K. L. (2000): “P300 as a clinical assay: rationale, evalua-tion, and findings”, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 38(1), pp. 3-19.
REIS, J. et al. (2009): “Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill ac-quisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation”, Proceed-ings of the National Academy of Sci-ences, 106(5), pp. 1590-1595.
RODRÍGUEZ-GÓMEZ, P. et al. (2018): “When logical conclusions go against beliefs: an ERP study”, Lan-guage, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(6), pp. 687-697.
ROSS, L. A. et al. (2011): “Improved Proper Name Recall in Aging after Electrical Stimulation of the Anterior Temporal Lobes”, Frontiers in Aging Neurosci-ence, 3, pp. 16.
SCHLAUG, G. et al. (2011): “The use of non-invasive brain stimulation tech-niques to facilitate recovery from post-stroke aphasia”, Neuropsychol-ogy Review, 21(3), pp. 288–301.
SIEBNER, H. R. et al. (2009): “How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition”, Cortex, 45(9), pp. 1035-1042.
THIEL, A. et al. (2013): “Effects of noninva-sive brain stimulation on language networks and recovery in early post-stroke aphasia”, Stroke, 44(8), pp. 2240-2246.