Lograr la coherencia en proyectos Erasmus+. Aprender y vivir la sostenibilidad
Learning green, Living green
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_educ_ambient_sostenibilidad.2025.v7.i2.2301Informação
Autores
- Julia Gracia Ordóñez (ES) Universidad de Córdoba
- Jorge Alcántara Manzanares (ES) Universidad de Córdoba
- Jerónimo Torres Porras (ES) Universidad de Córdoba
Resumo
Este estudio analiza 239 proyectos Erasmus+ de movilidad de corta duración para alumnado y docentes implementados durante 2022-2023 y centrados en el tema del medioambiente y cambio climático. Uno de los valores principales del presente análisis es que se ha llevado a cabo en una fase temprana de la implementación de la Recomendación del Consejo relativa al aprendizaje para la transición ecológica y el desarrollo sostenible. Asimismo, los proyectos y sus análisis abarcan la mayoría de las etapas educativas (Infantil, Primaria, Secundaria, FP y Educación de Adultos) y sus actividades están orientadas al desarrollo de competencias en materia de sostenibilidad. Siguiendo la Guía del programa, los proyectos deberían basarse en las necesidades del entorno local, adoptar un enfoque participativo desde su diseño, implicar a toda la comunidad educativa, apoyarse en la plataforma eTwinning para completar el trabajo previo, integrar programas complementarios de medioambiente y sostenibilidad y ser coherentes en cuanto al uso de transporte sostenible, alimentación y reducción consciente de energía y residuos. De igual forma, deberían aprovechar al máximo las movilidades físicas, al tiempo que potenciar el aprendizaje al aire libre y las actividades prácticas en las que el alumnado trabaja en colaboración y aprende de forma experiencial en otros países, equilibrando las necesidades de formación del profesorado con las inestimables experiencias que podría adquirir el alumnado al reconectar con la naturaleza y cuestionar críticamente su estilo de vida y prácticas cotidianas. En última instancia, esta investigación contribuye a generar propuestas para futuras líneas de investigación al ayudar a los profesionales de la educación, las administraciones y otras partes interesadas a reconsiderar algunas prácticas actuales extendidas.
Palavras-chave
Downloads
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Julia Gracia Ordóñez, Jorge Alcántara Manzanares, Jerónimo Torres Porras
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as podrán conservar sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) una vez el manuscrito sea aceptado, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Referências
Akerlof, K. (2017). When Should Environmental Awareness Be a Policy Goal?. In: Loreto, V., et al. Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25658-0_15
Andreou, N. (2020). Towards a Generation of Sustainability Leaders: Eco-Schools as a Global Green Schools Movement for Transformative Education. In: Gough, A., Lee, J.CK., Tsang, E.P.K. (eds) Green Schools Globally. International Explorations in Outdoor and Environmental Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46820-0_3
Ausubel, J. H., Marchetti, C., & Meyer, P. S. (1998). Toward green mobility: the evolution of transport. European Review, 6(2), 137–156. 10.1017/S1062798700003185
Avelar, A. B. A., da Silva-Oliveira, K. D., & da Silva Pereira, R. (2019). Education for advancing the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals: A systematic approach. The international journal of management education, 17(3), 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100322
Barth, M. & Michelsen, G. (2013). Learning for change: an educational contribution to sustainability science. Sustain Sci 8, 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0181-5
Borg, F., & Samuelsson, I. P. (2022). Preschool children’s agency in education for sustainability: the case of Sweden. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 30(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2022.2026439
Chawla, L. (1988). Children’s Concern for the Natural Environment. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(3), 13–20. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41514681
Collado, S., Evans, G. W., Corraliza, J. A., & Sorrel, M. A. (2015). The role played by age on children's pro-ecological behaviors: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 85-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.09.006
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on achieving the European Education Area by 2025. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0625
Council conclusions of 19 November 2010 on education for sustainable development (2010/C 327/05). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:327:0011:0014:EN:PDF
Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (2018/C 189/01). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)
Council Recommendation on learning for environmental sustainability 2022/0004. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0011
Decision No 2179/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 1998 on the review of the European Community programme of policy and action in relation to the environment and sustainable development "Towards sustainability". Fifth European Community environment programme: towards sustainability. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Al28062
Ernst, J., Blood, N., & Beery, T. (2015). Environmental action and student environmental leaders: exploring the influence of environmental attitudes, locus of control, and sense of personal responsibility. Environmental Education Research, 23(2), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1068278
European Commission. EACEA. Eurydice (2024). Learning for sustainability in Europe: Building competences and supporting teachers and schools. Eurydice report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission (2023). Erasmus+ Programme Guide. https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/programme-guide/part-a
European Commission. Directorate General Communication (2022). Future of Europe – Young People 2282 / FL502. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2282
European Commission (2022b). Commission Staff Working Document. Accompanying the document. Proposal for a Council Recommendation on learning for environmental sustainability. SWD(2022)3. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022SC0003
European Commission: Directorate-General for Communication, (2021). European green deal : delivering on our targets, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2775/373022
European Commission: Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, (2021). Data collection and analysis of Erasmus+ projects : focus on education for environmental sustainability : final report, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/29038
European Commission: European Education and Culture Executive Agency, Scimeca, S., Pateraki, I., Licht, A. (2020). Classrooms in action : teaching climate change with eTwinning, (S.Scimeca,editor,I.Pateraki,editor,A.Licht,editor) Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/608452
European Commission: European Education and Culture Executive Agency, Hanna Licht, A., Pateraki, I., & Scimeca, S. (2020). eTwinning schools : towards a shared leadership approach : quantitative and qualitative analysis of the eTwinning school practices : summary report 2020, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/305815
European Commission: European Education and Culture Executive Agency, (2021). Teaching media literacy and fighting disinformation with eTwinning, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2797/268
European Commission: Joint Research Centre, (2022). GreenComp, the European sustainability competence framework, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/13286
European Commission: Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, (2023). Erasmus+ annual report 2022, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/211791
European Commission (2024). European School Education Platform. Survey on promoting education for sustainability – Results. https://school-education.ec.europa.eu/en/discover/expert-views/survey-promoting-education-sustainability-results
European Environment Agency (2024). Accelerating the circular economy in Europe. State and outlook 2024. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/accelerating-the-circular-economy
Fercoq, A., Lamouri, S., & Carbone, V. (2016). Lean/Green integration focused on waste reduction techniques. Journal of Cleaner production, 137, 567-578.
Gericke, N., Seiser, A.F., Mogren, A., Berglund, T., & Olsson, D. (2024). How to Institutionalize a Whole School Approach to ESD. In: Wals, A.E., Bjønness, B., Sinnes, A., Eikeland, I. (eds) Whole School Approaches to Sustainability. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56172-6_4
Gough, S. (2002). “Right Answers or Wrong Problems? Towards a Theory of Change for Environmental Learning.” Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy 18 (1): 1–15.
Grilli, G., & Curtis, J. (2021). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviours: A review of methods and approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110039
Hartman, C. L., Hofman, P. S., & Stafford, E. R. (1999). Partnerships: a path to sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 8(5), 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199909/10)8:5%3C255::AID-BSE214%3E3.0.CO;2-O
Heritage, Z. & Dooris, M. (2009). Community participation and empowerment in Healthy Cities, Health Promotion International 24(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap054
Holliday, J.C.O., Schmidheiny, S., & Watts, P. (2002). Walking the Talk: The Business Case for Sustainable Development (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351281966
Hosany, A. S., Hosany, S., & He, H. (2022). Children sustainable behaviour: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 147, 236-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.008
Krettenauer, T., Lefebvre, J. P., & Goddeeris, H. (2024). Pro-environmental behaviour, connectedness with nature, and the endorsement of pro-environmental norms in youth: Longitudinal relations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 94, 102256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102256
Jones, P., Selby, D., & Sterling, S. (2010). More than the sum of their parts? Interdisciplinarity and sustainability. In Sustainability education,17-37. Routledge.
Jucker, R. & von Au, J. (2022). Outdoor Learning—Why It Should Be High up on the Agenda of Every Educator. In: Jucker, R., von Au, J. (eds) High-Quality Outdoor Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04108-2_1
Lonning, R. A., DeFranco, T. C., & Weinland, T. P. (1998). Development of theme‐based, interdisciplinary, integrated curriculum: A theoretical model. School Science and mathematics, 98(6), 312-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17426.x
Mayring, P. (2000) Qualitative Content Analysis, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1, Article Number: 20.
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089/2385
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and
software solution, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
Mayring, P. (2019). Qualitative content analysis:Demarcation, varieties, developments.” [QualitativeInhaltsanalyse – Abgrenzungen, Spielarten,Weiterentwicklungen]. The Forum, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3343
Miller, T.R., Muñoz-Erickson, T. & Redman, C.L. (2011). "Transforming knowledge for sustainability: towards adaptive academic institutions", International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371111118228
Olsson, D. & Gericke, N. (2015). The adolescent dip in students’ sustainability consciousness—Implications for education for sustainable development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1075464
Patterson, M. G. (1996). What is energy efficiency?: Concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy policy, 24(5), 377-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(96)00017-1
Recommendation of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF
Regulation (EC) No 2493/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 November2000 on measures to promote the full integration of the environmental dimension in the development process of developing countries. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2000:288:0001:0005:EN:PDF
Resolution of the Council and the Ministers of Education meeting within the Council on Environmental education of 24 May 1988. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A41988X0706%2802%29
Resolution of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 1 February 1993 on a Community programme of policy and action in relation to the environment and sustainable development. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:41993X0517
Runhaar, P., Wagenaar, K., Wesselink, R., & Runhaar, H. (2019). Encouraging Students’ Pro-environmental Behaviour: Examining the Interplay Between Student Characteristics and the Situational Strength of Schools. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 13(1), 45-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408219840544
Sass, W., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Olsson, D., Gericke, N., De Maeyer, S., & Van Petegem, P. (2020). Redefining action competence: The case of sustainable development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1765132
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
Silva, M.E. & Figueiredo, M.D. (2017). Sustainability as Practice: Reflections on the Creation of an Institutional Logic. Sustainability 9, 1839. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101839
Simmons, D. A. (1991). Are We Meeting the Goal of Responsible Environmental Behavior? An Examination of Nature and Environmental Education Center Goals. The Journal of Environmental Education, 22(3), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1991.10801963
Spiteri, J. (2020). Why is it important to protect the environment? Reasons presented by young children. Environmental Education Research, 27(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1829560
Stevenson, R. B., Lasen, M., Ferreira, J. A., & Davis, J. (2017). Approaches to embedding sustainability in teacher education: A synthesis of the literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.013
Taimur, S. & Sattar, H. (2020). Education for Sustainable Development and Critical Thinking Competency. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A.M., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P.G., Wall, T. (eds) Quality Education. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95870-5_64
Thomaes, S., Grapsas, S., van de Wetering, J., Spitzer, J., & Poorthuis, A. (2023). Green teens: Understanding and promoting adolescents’ sustainable engagement. One Earth, 6(4), 352-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.02.006
Tilbury, D. (2007). Learning based change for sustainability: perspectives and pathways. In Social learning towards a sustainable world (pp. 117-131). Wageningen Academic.
UN General Assembly, (2015 October 21) Transformingour world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) (2002) Education for Sustainability, From Rio to Johannesburg: Lessons Learnt from a Decade of Commitment, report presented at the Johannesburg World Summit for Sustainable Development, Paris.
Wallis, H., & Loy, L. S. (2021). What drives pro-environmental activism of young people? A survey study on the Fridays For Future movement. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101581
Wals, A. E., Bjønness, B., Sinnes, A., & Eikeland, I. (2024). Whole School Approaches to Sustainability: Education Renewal in Times of Distress. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/92314
Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008). A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. Ecological economics research trends, 1(2008), 1-11.
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L. & Redman, C.L. Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6, 203–218 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6
Wiggins, G. (1989). The futility of trying to teach everything of importance. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 44-59.
Wray-Lake, L., Flanagan, C. A., & Osgood, D. W. (2010). Examining Trends in Adolescent Environmental Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors Across Three Decades. Environment and Behavior, 42(1), 61-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916509335163