Implications of the relevance approach ti the context for the interpretation of ironic utterances
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.1999.i7.09Información
Autores/as
- M. Ángeles Ruíz Moneva (ES) Universidad de Zaragoza
Resumen
El objetivo principal de este trabajo será mostrar las relaciones existentes entre las oraciones que admiten una interpretación irónica y en el contexto en el que tienen lugar, siguiendo el marco general de la teoría de la relevancia o pertinencia propuesto para explicar la comunicación. Este trabajo analizará los principales enfoques planteados por la teoría de la relevancia o pertinencia, que tienden a enfatizar su naturaleza cognitiva. Si se admite que el contexto juega un papel primordial en la interpretación de las oraciones que admiten una interpretación irónica, y que, tal como afirman los autores que trabajan en el marco de la teoría de la relevancia, el contexto es seleccionado por los participantes de cualquier interacción comunicativa, resulta que el grado de accesibilidad que los participantes pueden tener al contexto representado por el hablante repercutirá en su percepción de la ironía.
Palabras clave
Descargas
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2018 Pragmalingüística
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Citas
BARBE, K. (1995), Irony in Context, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Co.
CLARK, H. H. (1982), "The Relevance of Common Ground: Comments on Sperber & Wilson's Paper", in SMITH, N.V. (ed.) Mutual Knowledge, 124-127.
CLARK, H. H. & T.CARLSON (1982), "Speech Acts and Hearers' Beliefs", in Smith, N.V. (ed), Mutual Knowledge, 1-36.
CLARK, H. H. & T. CARLSON (1982), "Critics' Beliefs about Hearers' Beliefs: ARejoinder to Johnson-Laird, Sperber & Wilks", in Smith, N.V. (ed.). Mutual Knowledge, 53-59.
CLARK, H. H. & R. J. GERRIG (1984), "On the Pretense Theory of Irony", in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113: 1, 121-126.
GRICE, P. (1957), "Meaning", in Steinberg, D.D. & L.A. Jakobovits, Semantics. Cambridge, CUP, 1971, 53-59.
GRICE, P. (1970), "Presupposition and Conversational Implicature", in Cole, P. (ed), Radical Pragmatics. New York, Academic Press, 1981, 183-198.
GRICE, P. (1975), "Logic and Conversation", in Cole, P. & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. III. Speech Acts. New York, Academic Press, 41-58.
GRICE, P. (1978), "Further notes on logic and conversation", in Cole, P. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics. Vol. IX. New York, Academic Press, 1978, 113-127.
GRICE, P. (1982), "Meaning Revisited", in Smith, N. V. (ed), Mutual Knowledge. London, Academic Press, 223-243.
HALLIDAY, M.Α.Κ. (1973), Explorations in the Functions of Language. London, Edward Arnold, 1977.
JORGENSEN, J., G.MILLER & D.SPERBER (1984), "Test of the mention theory of irony", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113: 1, 112-120.
MARISCAL CHICANO, J. M. (1994), "¿Quién finge la ironía pertinente?", Pragmalingüistica, 2, 319-356.
MARTIN, R. (1992), "Irony and universe of belief", Lingua, 87, 77-90.
MUECKE, D. C. (1969), The Compass of Irony. London, Methuen.
MUECKE, D. C. (1970), Irony, London, Methuen.
SPERBER, D. (1982), "Comments on Clark & Carlson's Paper", in Smith, N.V. Mutual Knowledge. London, Academic Press, 46-51.
SPERBER, D. (1984), "Verbal Irony: Pretense or Echoic Mention?", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 1, 130-136.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1978), "Les ironies comme mentions", Poétique, 36, 399-412.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1981a), "Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction", in Cole, P. (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York, Academic Press, 295-318.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1981b), "Pragmatics", Cognition, 10, 281-286.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1982a), "Mutual Knowledge and Relevance in Theories of Comprehension", in Smith, N.V. Mutual Knowledge. London, Academic Press, 61-85.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1982b), "Reply to Gazdar & Good", in Smith, N.V. Mutual Knowledge. London, Academic Press, 101-110.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1982c), "Reply to Clark", in Smith, N.V. Mutual Knowledge. London, Academic Press, 128-131.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1986), Relevance: Communication and Cognition London, Blackwell, 1995.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1987), "Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition", Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 10, 697-754.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1990), "Rhetoric and Relevance", in Bender, J. & D. D. Wellbery. The Ends of Rhetoric. History, Theory and Practice. Standford, Standford University Press, 140-155.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1993), "Relevanceand Time", UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 5, 277-300.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1995), Relevance: Communication and Cognition. London, Blackwell. (2nd. edition)
TANAKA, R. (1973), "The Concept of Irony: Theory and Practice", Journal of Literary Semantics, 2, 43-56.
WILLIAMS, J. (1984), "Does Mention (or Pretense) Exhaust the Concept of Irony?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113: 1, 127-129.
WILSON, D. (1975), Presuppositions and Non-Truth Conditional Semantics, London, Academic Press.
WILSON, D. (1979), The Results of Chomsky's Revolution, London, Academic Press.
WILSON, D. (1992), "Reference and Relevance", UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 4, 167-191.
WILSON, D. (1994), "Relevance and Understanding", in Brown, G. et al. (eds.), Language and Understanding. Oxford, OUP, 35-58.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1981), "On Grice's theory of conversation", in Werth, P. (ed.), Conversation and Discourse. London, Croom Helm, 155-178.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER, (1986), "Inference and implicature", in Travis, C. Meaning and Interpretation. Oxford, Blackwell, 45-76.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1988), "Representation and relevance", in Kempson, R. (ed.) Mental representations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 133-154.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1989), "On verbal irony", UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 1, 96-117.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1990), "Linguistic Form and Relevance", UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 95-112.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1992), "On verbal irony", Lingua, 87, 53-76.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1993), "Linguistic form and relevance", Lingua, 90, 1-25.