Implications de l'approche de la pertinence du contexte pour l'interprétation des énoncés ironiques
Auteurs
- M. Ángeles Ruíz Moneva (ES) Universidad de Zaragoza
Résumé
Le principal objectif de ce travail va être de présenter les relations qui existent entre les phrases admettant une interprétation ironique et le contexte où elles se développent, tout en suivant le cadre général de la théorie de la relevance ou de la pertinence proposé pour expliquer la communication. Ce travail analysera les principales mises au point proposeés par la théorie de la relevance ou de la pertinence, qui ont tendance à faire ressortir sa nature cognitive. Si on admet que le contexte joue un rôle primordial dans les phrases qui admettent une interprétation ironique, et que le contexte est choisi par les participants d'une interaction communicative quelconque, tel que l' ont affirmé les auteurs qui travaillent dans le cadre de la théorie de la "relevance", il se trouve que le degré d' accessibilité que les participants peuvent avoir au contexte représenté par le sujet parlant va répercuter sur sa perception de l' ironie.
Mots-clés
Téléchargements
Comment citer
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Pragmalingüística 2018
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
Références
BARBE, K. (1995), Irony in Context, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Co.
CLARK, H. H. (1982), "The Relevance of Common Ground: Comments on Sperber & Wilson's Paper", in SMITH, N.V. (ed.) Mutual Knowledge, 124-127.
CLARK, H. H. & T.CARLSON (1982), "Speech Acts and Hearers' Beliefs", in Smith, N.V. (ed), Mutual Knowledge, 1-36.
CLARK, H. H. & T. CARLSON (1982), "Critics' Beliefs about Hearers' Beliefs: ARejoinder to Johnson-Laird, Sperber & Wilks", in Smith, N.V. (ed.). Mutual Knowledge, 53-59.
CLARK, H. H. & R. J. GERRIG (1984), "On the Pretense Theory of Irony", in Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113: 1, 121-126.
GRICE, P. (1957), "Meaning", in Steinberg, D.D. & L.A. Jakobovits, Semantics. Cambridge, CUP, 1971, 53-59.
GRICE, P. (1970), "Presupposition and Conversational Implicature", in Cole, P. (ed), Radical Pragmatics. New York, Academic Press, 1981, 183-198.
GRICE, P. (1975), "Logic and Conversation", in Cole, P. & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. III. Speech Acts. New York, Academic Press, 41-58.
GRICE, P. (1978), "Further notes on logic and conversation", in Cole, P. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics. Vol. IX. New York, Academic Press, 1978, 113-127.
GRICE, P. (1982), "Meaning Revisited", in Smith, N. V. (ed), Mutual Knowledge. London, Academic Press, 223-243.
HALLIDAY, M.Α.Κ. (1973), Explorations in the Functions of Language. London, Edward Arnold, 1977.
JORGENSEN, J., G.MILLER & D.SPERBER (1984), "Test of the mention theory of irony", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113: 1, 112-120.
MARISCAL CHICANO, J. M. (1994), "¿Quién finge la ironía pertinente?", Pragmalingüistica, 2, 319-356.
MARTIN, R. (1992), "Irony and universe of belief", Lingua, 87, 77-90.
MUECKE, D. C. (1969), The Compass of Irony. London, Methuen.
MUECKE, D. C. (1970), Irony, London, Methuen.
SPERBER, D. (1982), "Comments on Clark & Carlson's Paper", in Smith, N.V. Mutual Knowledge. London, Academic Press, 46-51.
SPERBER, D. (1984), "Verbal Irony: Pretense or Echoic Mention?", Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 1, 130-136.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1978), "Les ironies comme mentions", Poétique, 36, 399-412.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1981a), "Irony and the Use-Mention Distinction", in Cole, P. (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York, Academic Press, 295-318.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1981b), "Pragmatics", Cognition, 10, 281-286.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1982a), "Mutual Knowledge and Relevance in Theories of Comprehension", in Smith, N.V. Mutual Knowledge. London, Academic Press, 61-85.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1982b), "Reply to Gazdar & Good", in Smith, N.V. Mutual Knowledge. London, Academic Press, 101-110.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1982c), "Reply to Clark", in Smith, N.V. Mutual Knowledge. London, Academic Press, 128-131.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1986), Relevance: Communication and Cognition London, Blackwell, 1995.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1987), "Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition", Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 10, 697-754.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1990), "Rhetoric and Relevance", in Bender, J. & D. D. Wellbery. The Ends of Rhetoric. History, Theory and Practice. Standford, Standford University Press, 140-155.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1993), "Relevanceand Time", UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 5, 277-300.
SPERBER, D. & D. WILSON (1995), Relevance: Communication and Cognition. London, Blackwell. (2nd. edition)
TANAKA, R. (1973), "The Concept of Irony: Theory and Practice", Journal of Literary Semantics, 2, 43-56.
WILLIAMS, J. (1984), "Does Mention (or Pretense) Exhaust the Concept of Irony?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113: 1, 127-129.
WILSON, D. (1975), Presuppositions and Non-Truth Conditional Semantics, London, Academic Press.
WILSON, D. (1979), The Results of Chomsky's Revolution, London, Academic Press.
WILSON, D. (1992), "Reference and Relevance", UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 4, 167-191.
WILSON, D. (1994), "Relevance and Understanding", in Brown, G. et al. (eds.), Language and Understanding. Oxford, OUP, 35-58.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1981), "On Grice's theory of conversation", in Werth, P. (ed.), Conversation and Discourse. London, Croom Helm, 155-178.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER, (1986), "Inference and implicature", in Travis, C. Meaning and Interpretation. Oxford, Blackwell, 45-76.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1988), "Representation and relevance", in Kempson, R. (ed.) Mental representations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 133-154.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1989), "On verbal irony", UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 1, 96-117.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1990), "Linguistic Form and Relevance", UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 95-112.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1992), "On verbal irony", Lingua, 87, 53-76.
WILSON, D. & D. SPERBER (1993), "Linguistic form and relevance", Lingua, 90, 1-25.