Euphemistic strategies in politeness and face concerns.
Authors
- Eliecer Crespo Fernández, (ES) Departamento de Filología Inglesa Facultad de Filosofía y Letras Universidad de Alicante Apartado Correos 99 03080 – Alicante
Abstract
The present paper aims to shed light on the implications of euphemism in relation to the notion of face(Goffmann 1967) within the framework of linguistic politeness (Brown and Levinson 1987). For this purpose,I claim that impoliteness is a social taboo on which euphemistic mitigation acts and, with this in mind, I considereuphemism not only as a strictly lexical process used to tone down certain concepts deemed unfit for normallinguistic usage, but also as a more comprehensive phenomenon with a primarily discursive dimension. In thisregard, a typology of strategies of non-hostile verbal communication is proposed. From this perspective,euphemism is understood as a powerful discursive tool used to enhance politenes, preserve the public self-imageof the participants in communicative exchanges and, therefore, facilitate harmonious interpersonal relationships.
Keywords
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Pragmalingüística
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
ALLAN, K. & K. BURRIDGE (1991), Euphemism and Dysphemism. Language Used as Shield and Weapon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BROWN, P. & S. LEVINSON (1987), Politeness. Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BURCHFIELD, R. (1985), "An outline history of euphemisms in English", in D. J. Enright (ed.). Fair of Speech. The Uses of Euphemism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 13-31.
CASAS, M. (1986), La interdicción lingüística. Mecanismos del eufemismo y disfemis-mo. Cádiz: Universidad de Cádiz
CRESPO, E. (2005), El eufemismo, el disfemismo y los procesos mixtos. La manipulación del referente en el lenguaje literario inglés desde mediados del siglo XIX hasta la actualidad. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
FRASER, B. (1990), "Perspectives on politeness", Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219-236.
GARCÍA, P. (2000), Cómo hablan las mujeres. Madrid: Arco.
GOFFMANN, E. (1967), Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York Double Day.
GUILLÉN, V. (1994), El diálogo dramático y la representación escénica. Alicante: Instituto de Cultura Juan Gil Albert
HELD, G. (1992), "Politeness in linguistic research", in R. J. Watts at al. (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 131-153.
HUDSON, R. A. (1980), Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
KIENTPOINTNER, M. (1997), "Varieties of rudeness. Types and functions of polite utterances", Functions of Language 4-2: 251-287.
LEECH, G. (1983), Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
McGLONE, M. & J. A BATCHELOR (2003), "Looking out for number one: Euphemism and face", Journal of Communication 53: 251-264.
MONTERO, E. (1981), El eufemismo en Galicia (su comparación con otras lenguas romances). Verba. Anexo 17. Santiago de Compostela, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
PYLES, T. & J. ALGEO (1982), The Origins and Development of the English Language. New York: Harcourt.
QUIRK, R. et al. (1972), A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
RODRÍGUEZ, F. (1991), Prensa y lenguaje político. Madrid: Fundamentos.
TRUDGILL, P. (1974), Sociolinguistics. An Introduction. Hardmonsworth: Penguin.
WARDAUGH, R. (1985), An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
WATTS, R. J. et al. (1992), "Introduction", in R. J. Watts et al. (eds.), Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1-17.