The self-legitimation and delegitimation of the power in the discourse of the 20 february movement in Morocco: A critical discourse approach
Additional Files
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2014.i22.07Info
Authors
- Adil Moustaoui Srhir (ES) Departamento de Estudios Árabes e Islámicos Facultad de Filología Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Abstract
In the Arab Spring the aim of the discursive practices was to gain access to political discourse in the public sphere and media dis
course or social networks. Consequently, this use has been an important factor and a key element in the failure, success or continuation of the process of delegitimization of the State apparatus by the social actors of these popular mobilizations. Taking the above background into
consideration, the aim of this paper is to analyse the discursive process of self-legitimation and delegitmation of the power in the discourse of the 20 February Movement in Morocco
(M20F). The theoretical framework in which frames the analysis of the process of legitimation, self-delegitimation and delegitimation in the discourses of the M20F is: i) the notion of discursive legitimation Van Dijk
and Martin Rojo (1997), Van Dijk (2003) and Chilton (2011), ii) the notion of context of Van Dijk, principally that refers to the local andglobal context Van Dijk (1999) and2003), and iii) the definition of discourse and discursive strategies notion from historical discursive approach Wodak (1999, 2001, 2003 and 2005).
Keywords
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Pragmalingüística
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
AL’AZĀWĪ, W. (2011): “A-thawarāt Al‘arabiya wa Istiḥqaqāt A-taghyīr (Les révolutions arabes et les avantages
du changement)”, Shu’un Al-Awsat, 139, pp. 32-44 .
ALMANJDRA, M. (2003): Humiliation à l’ère du méga-impérialisme, Al Jadida: Annajah.
BECHIR AYARI, M. & GEISSER, V. (2011): Rennaissances árabes. 7 clés sur des révolutions en marche, Pari: Les Éditions de l’Atelier/Éditions ouvrières.
BEN NEFISSA, S. (2011): “Mobilisations et révolutions dans les pays de la Méditerranée arabe à l’heure de “l’hybridation” du politique”, Revue Tiers Monde, Protestations sociales, révolutions civiles. Transformation du politique dans la Méditerranée arabe. Hors série, Sarah Ben Néfissa y Blandine Destremau (coord.), Paris: Armand Colin, pp. 5-24.
BEN NEFISSA, S. (2011): “Les angles morts de l’analyse politique des sociétés de la région”, Confluences méditerranée, 77, pp. 75-100.
BENNFLA, K. (2011): “Introduction”, Confluences méditerranée, 78, pp. 9-24.
BOUKOUS, A. (2008): “Le champ langagier: Diversité et stratification”, Revue Asinag, 1, pp. 15-37.
BOURDIEU, P. (1982): Ce que parler veut dire, Paris: Gallimard.
CATUSSE, M. (2011): “Le “social”: une affaire d’Etat dans le Maroc de Mohammed VI”, Confluences méditerranée, 78, pp. 63-76.
CHILTON, P. A. (2011): “Argumentos Criticables: Repensando a Habermas a la luz de la lingüística”, Discurso & Sociedad, 5 (1), pp. 71-95
CHILTON, P. A. 2004, Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice, London, Routledge.
CHILTON. P. A. & SCHÄFFNER, C. (2002): Poltics As Text and Talk. Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
CICOUREl, A. (1980): “Three Models of Discourse Analysis: The Role of Social Structure”, Discourse Processes, 3, pp. 101-132.
FOUCAULT, M. (1971): L’ordre du discours, Paris, Gallimard.
FAOUAD, W. (2010): “Facebook y la juventud árabe. ¿Activismo social o liberación social”, Awraq, 9, pp. 93-100.
HAMMAMI, S. (2011): “Quand le peuple rentre en scène”, Medium, 29, pp.49-65.
HELLER, H. (2007): “Distributed Knowledge, distributed power: A Sociolinguistics of structuration”, Text & Talk, 27, 5/6, pp.622-653.
HIBOU, B. (2011): Le mouvement du 20 février, le Makhzen et l’antipolitique. L’impensé des réformes au Maroc, mai 2011, Publicación electrónica: sciences-po.org. http://www.cerisciences-po.org.
KELLER, R. 2007: “L’analyse du discours du point du vue de la sociologie de la connaissance. Une perspective nouvelle pour les méthodes qualitatives”, Recherches qualitatives, 3, pp. 287-306.
SIDI HIDA, B. (2011): “Mobilisations collectives à l’épreuve des changements au Maroc”, Tiers Monde, Protestations sociales, révolutions civiles. Transformation du politique dans la Méditerranée arabe. Hors
série, Ben Néfissa. S. y Blandine D., (eds.), Paris: Armand Colin, pp. 163-188.
VAN DIJK T. & MARTIN ROJO, L., (1997): “There was a Problem, and it was Solved! Legitimating the Expulsion of “Illegal” Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse”, Discourse & Society, 8 (4), p. 523-66.
VAN DIJK, T. (1999): Ideología. Una aproximación multidisciplinar. Barcelona: Gedisa.
VAN DIJK, T. 2003, “La multidisciplinariedad del análisis crítico del discurso: un alegato a favor de la diversidad”, Wodak R. y Meyer, M (ed.), Métodos del análisis crítico del discurso, Barcelona: Gedisa, pp. 143-177.
VAN DIJK, T. 2006, “Discourse, context and cognition”, Discourse Studies, 8 (1), pp. 159-17.
VAN LEEUWEN, T. (1996): “The representation of social actors”, CaldasCoulthard, C. y Coulthard, M. (Coord.), Text and practice, London: Routledge, pp. 33-70.
WODAK, R. et al. (1999): “The discursive construction of national identity”, Discourse & Society, 10 (2), pp. 149-173.
WODAK, R. (2000): “¿La sociolingüística necesita una teoría social? Nuevas perspectivas en el Análisis Crítico del Discurso”, Discurso y Sociedad, 2 (3), pp. 123 -147.
WODAK, R. & REISIGL, M. (2001): Discourse and discrimination. Rhetoric of Racism and Antisemitism, London / New York: Routledge.
WODAK, R. & MEYER, M. (eds.) (2003): Métodos del análisis crítico del discurso, Barcelona, Gedisa.
WODAK, R. & CHILTON, P. A., (eds.) (2005): A New Agenda in Critical Discourse Analysis, Amsterdam /Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
WODAK, R. (2011): “Challenges to Critical Discourse Studies-Opening Borders and Transcending Dichotomies”, Conferencia presentada en el CDA Workshop, 24 de mars 2011, Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.