Analysis of ironic enunciation: from trope to polyphony
Authors
- Alberto Bruzos Moro (US) 401 East Pyne Building Princeton University 08544 New Jersey (EEUU)
Abstract
The pragmatic theories that firstly tried to define irony hardly reached further than the rhetorical conception,according to which irony is just a trope. This continuity is seldom assumed by modern authors. Actually, Kerbrat-Orecchioni seems to be the only one that considers her work in this way, while other theories present the sametropological pattern but covered under a new terminology. Quite the opposite, the polyphonic perspective byDucrot is an original, purely pragmatical and really alternative account of irony.
Keywords
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Pragmalingüística
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
AMANTE, D. J. (1981): “The theory of ironic speech acts”, Poetics Today, Vol. 2:2,págs.77-96.
ATTARDO, S. (2000): “Irony as relevant inappropiateness”, Journal of Pragmatics, 32,págs. 793-826.
BALLART, P. (1994): Eironeia: la figuración irónica en el discurso literario moderno,Barcelona, Quaderns Crema.
BERRENDONER, A. (1981): Elementos de pragmática lingüística, Buenos Aires, Gedisa,1987.
BOZAL, V. (1999): Necesidad de la ironía, Madrid, Visor.
BOOTH, W. C. (1974): A Rhetoric of Irony, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
DUCROT, O. (1984): El decir y lo dicho: polifonía de la enunciación, Barcelona, Paidós, 1986.
DUCROT, O. (1989): Logique, structure, énonciation, Paris, Les Éditions de Minuit.
DUCROT, O. (1990): Polifonía y argumentación, Universidad del Valle-Cali
ESCANDELL VIDAL, M. V. (1996): Introducción a la pragmática, Barcelona, Ariel.
GREIMAS, A. & COURTES, J. (1986): Semiótica: diccionario razonado de la teoría del lenguaje II, Madrid, Gredos, 1991.
GRICE, P. (1975): "Lógica y conversación", en Valdés Villanueva, L. M. (ed.) (1991): La búsqueda del significado: lecturas de filosofía del lenguaje, Madrid, Tecnos, págs. 511-530.
HAVERKATE, H. (1990): "A speech act analysis of irony", Journal of Pragmatics, 14, págs. 77-109.
HOLDCROFT, D. (1983): "Irony as a trope, and irony as a discourse", Poetics Today, Vol. 4:3, págs. 493-511.
JANKÉLÉVITCH, V. (1964): L'ironie, Flammarion.
KAUFER, D. S. (1981): "Understanding ironic communication", Journal of Pragmatics 5, 6, págs. 495-510.
KAUFER, D. S. (1983): "Irony: interpretive form and the theory of meaning", Poetics Today, Vol. 4:3, págs. 451-464.
KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI, C. (1980): "L'ironie comme trope", Poétique, 41, págs. 108-127.
KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI, C. (1980b): L'Enonciation: de la subjectivité dans le langage, Paris, Armand Colin.
KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI, C. (1986): L'implicite, Paris, Armand Colin.
KIERKEGAARD, S. (1841): Sobre el concepto de ironía, Madrid, Trotta, 2000.
KUNDERA, M. (1986): El arte de la novela, Barcelona, Tusquets, 1987.
LAUSBERG, H. (1973): Handbook of Literary Rhetoric, Leiden, Brill, 1998.
MORTARA GARAVELLI, B. (1988): Manual de retórica, Madrid, Cátedra, 1991.
MUECKE, D. C. (1982): Irony and the Ironic, London and New York, Methuen.
PLATÓN: Teeteto, en Diálogos Vol. V, Madrid, Gredos, 2000, págs. 133-311.
RICOEUR, P. (1975): La metáfora viva, Madrid, Trotta, 2001.
SCHOENTJES, P. (2001): Poétique de l'ironie, Paris, Éditions du Seuil.
SEARLE, J. (1969): Actos de habla, Madrid, Cátedra, 1980.
SEARLE, J. (1975): "Indirect speech acts", en Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.) (1975): Syntax and Semantics, III. Speech Acts, New York Academic Press, págs. 52-82.
SEARLE, J. (1979): "Metaphor", en Ortony, A. (ed.) (1993): Metaphor anf Thought, Cambridge University Press, págs. 83-111.