Pragmatics and metapragmatics in mother tonge. What about their acquisition is known from the experimental results?
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2015.i23.06Info
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to provide answers to two questions by means of two experiments taken from Noveck 's (2001) work: (i) does the acquisition of pragmatic competence come after semantic competence? Our results indicate that the acquisition of semantic information and pragmatic information are simultaneous. The acquisition of metapragmatic competence, on the other hand, does seem to be acquired later on; this is why it has been (wrongly) argued that pragmatic competence comes later, and (ii) is metapragmatic competence discrete or gradual? Our results show that it is gradual.
Keywords
Downloads
Supporting Agencies
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Pragmalingüística

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Barberán, T., I. García del Real y Mª J. Ezeizabarrena (2014): “Diferencias individuales en la interpretación temprana de la cuantificación y del aspecto en el español ibérico”, ms. En XVII Congreso Internacional de ALFAL.
Barner, D., N. Brooks y A. Bale (2010): “Quantity implicature and access to scalar alternatives in language acquisition”, Proceedings of SALT 20: 525-543. http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/download/20.525/1345
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A. (2011): “Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference”, Cognition, 118(1): 84-93. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027710002350
Carpendale, J. y M. J. Chandler (1996): “On the Distinction between false belief understanding and subscribing to an interpretative theory of mind”, Child Development, 67: 1686-1706. https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/7187
Crespo, N. y C. Alvarado (2010): “Conciencia metapragmática y memoria operativa en niños escolares”, Literatura y Lingüística, 21: 93-108. http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?pid=S0716-58112010000100008&script=sci_arttext&tlng=e
Davies, C. y N. Katsos (2010): “Over-informative children: Production/comprehension asymmetry or tolerance to pragmatic violations?”, Lingua, 120 (8): 1956 - 1972. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0024384110000240
Gombert, J. (1992): Metalinguistics Development, U. de Chicago Press.
Gualmini, A., S. Crain, L. Meroni, G. Chierchia y Mª T. Guasti (2001): “At the semantics/Pragmatics Interface in Child Language”, SALT XI: 231-247. http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/download/11.231/1709
Huang, Y. T. y J. Snedeker (2009): “Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in five-years-olds: evidence for real time spoken languages comprehension”, Developmental Psychology, 45(6): 1723-1739.
Katsos, N. y D.V.M. Bishop (2011): “Pragmatic Tolerance: implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature”, Cognition 120: 67-81. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027711000758
Katsos, N., Skordi, A., & de López, J. (2012): The acquisition of quantification across languages: some predictions. In The 36th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development: http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/vanderlely/files/2012_bucld_katsos_et_al..pdf
Noveck, I. A. (2001): “When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature”, Cognition 78: 165-188. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027700001141
Noveck, I. A. (2004): “Pragmatic Inferences related to Logical Terms”: http://www.sfu.ca/~jeffpell/Cogs300/NoveckPragmaticInferences.pdf
Papafragou, A. y J. Musolino (2002): “Scalar Implicatures: Experiments at the Semantic-Pragmatic Interface”, Cognition 86 (3): 253-282. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027702001798
Wellman, H. M. (1990): The child’s Theory of Mind, Cambridge, Massachussets, MIT Press.

