Developing argumentation in history texts: epistemic modality and evidentiality
Authors
- Francisco Alonso-Almeida (ES) University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
- Francisco José Álvarez-Gil (ES) University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8752-9091
Abstract
This paper reports on the use of epistemic modal devices and evidentials in order to indicate perspective in modern English texts in the domain of history. The data has been excerpted from the Corpus of History English Texts (CHET), compiled as a subsection of the Coruña Corpus at the University of A Coruña (Moskowich and Crespo, 2007). The corpus is to be used with its own corpus tool, i.e. the Coruña Corpus Tool (CCT) for text retrieval and analysis. There is not an agreed position concerning the relationship between epistemic modality and evidentiality. In this paper, our approach is disjunctive (see Dendale and Tasmowski, 2001) in the sense that it stands as a distinct category from epistemic modality, even if functional overlapping may result from the pragmatic interpretation of particular samples. Conclusions will show that these devices have a strong textual potential and can, therefore, be used to develop argumentation.Keywords
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Francisco Alonso Almeida, Francisco José Álvarez-Gil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
AIJMER, K. (2008): “At the Interface between Grammar and Discourse – a Corpus-Based Study of Some Pragmatic Markers”, Romero-Trillo, J. (ed.): Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 11-36.
AIKHENVALD, A. Y. (2006): Evidentiality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ALONSO-ALMEIDA, F. & CARRIÓ-PASTOR, M. L. (2017): “Variation and Function of Modals in Linguistics and Engineering Research Papers in English”, Marín-Arrese, J. I., Lavid-López, J., Carretero, M., Domínguez Romero, E., Martín de la Rosa, M.V. & Pérez Blanco, M. (eds.), Evidentiality and Modality in European Languages. Discourse-Pragmatic Perspectives, Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 277-311.
ÁLVAREZ-GIL, F. J. (2018): Adverbs ending in -Ly in Late Modern English. Evidence from the Coruña Corpus of History English Texts, Valencia: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
AUWERA, J. VAN DER & PLUNGIAN, V. A. (1998): “Modality’s Semantic Map”, Linguistic Typology, 2(1), pp. 79-124. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79.
BIBER, D., JOHANSSON, S. LEECH, G., CONRAD, S. & FINEGAN, E. (1999): Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, Harlow: Longman.
BOYE, K. & HARDER, P. (2009): “Evidentiality: Linguistic Categories and Grammaticalization”, Functions of Language, 16(1), pp. 9-43. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.03boy.
BYBEE, J. L., PERKINS, R. & PAGLIUCA, W. (1994): The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
CHAFE, W. (1986): “No Evidentiality in English Conversation and Academic Writing”, Wallace, C. & Nichols, J. (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Norwood: Ablex, pp. 261-272.
COLLINS, P. (2009): Modals and Quasi-Modals in English, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
CORNILLIE, B. (2009): “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: On the Close Relationship between Two Different Categories”, Functions of Language, 16(1), pp. 4-62. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.04cor.
CORNILLIE, B. & DELBECQUE, N. (2008): “Speaker Commitment: Back to the Speaker. Evidence from Spanish Alternations”, Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 22, pp. 37-62.
CUTTING, J. (2007): Vague Language Explored, London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.105/9780230627420.
DENDALE, P. & TASMOWSKI, L. (2001): “Introduction: Evidentiality and Related Notions”, Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), pp. 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00005-9.
EGGINS, S. (1994): An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics, London: Pinter.
FINEGAN, E. (1995). “Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: An Introduction”, Stein D., & Wright, S. (Eds.): Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.001.
HALLIDAY, M.A.K., & MATTHIESSEN, C.M.I.M. (2013). Halliday's Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.), London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
HOYE, L. (1997): Adverbs and Modality in English, Essex: Longman.
HUDDLESTON R. & PULLUM G. (2002): The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HYLAND, K. (2005): Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing, London: Continuum.
MOSKOWICH, I. (2017): “Genre and change in the Corpus of History of English Texts”, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 16 (3), pp. 84-106.
MOSKOWICH, I. (2011): “'The Golden Rule of Divine Philosophy' Exemplified in the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing”, Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 17, pp. 167-198.
MUSHIN, I. (2000): “Evidentiality and Deixis in Narrative Retelling”, Journal of Pragmatics, 32(7), pp. 927-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00085-5.
NUYTS, J. (2001): “Subjectivity as an Evidential Dimension in Epistemic Modal Expressions”, Journal of Pragmatics, 33(3), pp. 383-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00009-6.
PALMER, F. R. (1986): Mood and Modality. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PALMER, F. (2001): Mood and Modality (2nd ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PLUNGIAN, V. A. (2001): “The Place of Evidentiality within the Universal Grammatical Space”, Journal of Pragmatics, 33 (3), pp. 349-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00006-0.
ROORYCK, J. (2001): “Evidentiality, Part I”, Glot International, 5, pp. 125-133.
WILLETT, T. (1988): “A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticization of Evidentiality”, Studies in Language, 12(1), pp. 51-97. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil.