Español
![](https://revistas.uca.es/public/journals/22/submission_7089_8821_coverImage_es_ES.png)
Downloads
- PDF (Español (España)) 1026
- EPUB (Español (España)) 62
- VISOR (Español (España))
- MÓVIL (Español (España))
- XML (Español (España)) 59
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i2.2802Info
Abstract
This article presents a research focused on modeling and programming for the learning to Genetics Engineering (GI) in the high school. We designed, implemented and analyzed a didactic sequence around the construction of recombinant insulin in which the students had to build models by programming in Scratch. The models constructed were characterized from three theorical categories linked to biological models: continuity, interaction and transformation and integration. Were obtained three types of models, in each type of model the categories analized were found in different levels of development. The students were able to conceptualize the GI and the modelling allowed them express the factors and processes necessary for the construction of rDNA molecule (recombinant DNA) using GI.
Keywords
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Gimena Fussero, Maricel Occelli
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process. This allow the / o authors / is non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons is available on flexible copyright licenses (Creative Commons).
Reconocimiento-NoComercial
CC BY-NC
References
Adúriz-Bravo A. (2013) A semantic view of scientific models for science education. Science and Education 22 (7), 1593-1611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9431-7
Bahamonde N., Gómez Galindo A.G. (2016) Caracterización de modelos de digestión humana a partir de sus representaciones y análisis de su evolución en un grupo de docentes y auxiliares académicos. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 34 (1), 129-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1748
Blanco-Anaya P., Díaz de Bustamante J. (2017) Análisis del nivel de desempeño para la explicación de fenómenos de forma científica en una actividad de modelización. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 14 (3), 505-530. http://hdl.handle.net/10498/19504
Buckley B.C., Quellmalz E.S. (2013) Supporting and assessing complex biology learning with computer-based simulations and representations. En D.F. Treagust, C.Y. Tsui (Eds.), Multiple Representations in Biological Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education (pp 247-268). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_14
Crujeiras Pérez B., Jiménez Aleixandre M.P. (2015) Desafíos planteados por las actividades abiertas de indagación en el laboratorio: articulación de conocimientos teóricos y prácticos en las prácticas científicas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 33 (1), 63-84. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1469
Doènech-Casal J. (2020) Construyendo un simulador de ecosistemas. Una experiencia STEM de enseñanza de dinámica de los ecosistemas, funciones matemáticas y programación. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 17 (3), 3202. DOI: http://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2020.v17.i3.3202
France B. (2020) Socially Acute Questions: How Biotechnology Can Provide Context and Content for Discussion in Food Technology Education. En M. Rutland, A. Turner (Eds.), Food Education and Food Technology in School Curricula (pp 273-282). Cham: Springer. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39339-7_18
García Monsálvez J.C. (2017). Python as First Textual Programming Language in Secondary Education. Education in the Knowledge Society, 18(2), 147-162.
Gardner G.E., Troelstrup A. (2015) Student's Attitudes Toward Gene Technology: Deconstructing a Construct. Journal of Science Education and Technology 24 (5), 519-523. DOI: http://dHYPERLINK "http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9542-4"oi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9542-4
Giere R.N. (1999) Using Models to Represent Reality. En L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian, R. Thagard (Eds.) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery (pp. 41-58). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4813-3_3
Gilbert J.K. (2004) Models and modelling: Routes to a more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2 (2), 155-130. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3186-4
Gilbert J.K., Justi R. (2018). Introducing Modelling into School Science. En J. Yeo, T. Teo, K.S Tang (Eds.) Science Education Research and Practice in Asia-Pacific and Beyond (pp 25-38). DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5149-4_2
Guisasola J., Oliva J.M. (2020) Nueva sección especial de REudEDUC sobre investigación basada en el diseño de secuencias de enseñanza. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 17 (3), 3001. DOI: http://.doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2020.v17.i3.3001
Jablonka E., Lamb M.J. (2013) Evolución en cuatro dimensiones. Buenos Aires: Capital Intelectual.
Justi R., Gilbert J.K. (2002) Modelling teacher´s views on the nature of modelling implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education 24 (4), 369-387. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110110142
Lenhard, J., Küppers, G. y Shinn, T. (2007). Simulation: Pragmatic Constructions of Reality. Nueva York: Springer-Verlag
Occelli M. y Valeiras N. (2021). Knowledge and Attitudes towards Biotechnology in High School Students in Córdoba, Argentina. Journal of Science Education 21 (2), 44-50.
Oliva J.M. (2019) Distintas acepciones para la idea de modelización en la enseñanza de las ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias 37 (2), 5-24. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2648
Osborne J. (2014) Teaching Scientific Practices: Meeting the Challenge of Change. Journal of Science Teacher Education 25 (2), 177-196. DOI: http://.doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1
Pell A., Friedrichsen P. (2018) Algorithms, Abstractions and Iterations: Teaching Computational Thinking Using Protein Synthesis Translation. The American Biology Teacher 80 (1), 21-28.
Ponte J.P., Carvalho R., Mata-Pereira J., Quaresma M. (2016) Investigação baseada em design para compreender e melhorar as práticas educativas. Quadrade 25 (2), 77-98.
Prokop P., Leskiva A., Kubiatko M., Diran C. (2007) Slovakian students' knowledge of and attitudes toward biotechnology. International Journal of Science Education 29 (7), 895-907. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600969830
Puig B., Jiménez Aleixandre M. P. (2015) El modelo de expresión de los genes y el determinismo en los libros de texto de ciencias. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 12 (1), 55-65.
Reinagael A., Speth E.B. (2016) Beyond the Central Dogma: Model-Based Learning of How Genes Determine Phenotypes. Life Sciences Education 15 (1), 1-13. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-04-0105
Reiss M.J. (2018) Worldviews in Biology Education. En K. Kampourakis, M.J. Reiss (Eds.) Teaching Biology in Schools. Global Research, Issues and Trends (pp- 263-274). Nueva York: Routledge. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110158
Resnick, M., Rusk, N. (2020). Coding at a Crossroads. Communications of ACM, 63(11), 120-127.
Román-González J.M., Pérez-González J.C., Jiménez-Fernández, C. (2016) Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior 72, 678-691. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.047
Ruiz C., Banet E., López-Banet L. (2017) Conocimientos de estudiantes que inician el Bachillerato sobre nociones básicas de Genética y aplicaciones de la Biotecnología. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, N° extra, 1421-1428. http://ddd.uab.cat/record/184436?In=ca
Ruiz C., López-Banet L., Ayuso E. (2021) Conocimientos y valoraciones de estudiantes de bachillerato sobre la utilización de aplicaciones biotecnológicas. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 18 (1), 1102. DOI: http://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_cienc.2021.v18.il.1102
Schwarz C.V., Reiser B.J., Davis E.A., Kenyon L., Achér A., Fortus D., Shwartz Y., Hug B., Krajcik J. (2009) Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (6), 632-654. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
Shaffer J.F. (2013) From Cow Juice to a Billion Dollar Drug, With Some Breakthroughs in Between. National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science. http://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/collection/detail.html?case_id=684HYPERLINK "http://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/collection/detail.html?case_id=684&ide=684"&HYPERLINK "http://sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/collection/detail.html?case_id=684&ide=684"ide=684
Thieman, W. J. y Palladino, M. A. (2010). Introducción a la Biotecnología. 2° edición. Madrid: Editorial Pearson Educación.
Treagust D.F., Tsui C.Y. (2013) Multiple Representations in Biological Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8
Valverde Berrocoso J., Fernández Sánchez M.R., Garrido Arroyo M.C. (2015) El pensamiento computacional y las nuevas ecologías del aprendizaje. Revista de Educación a Distancia 46 (3). http://www.um.es/ead/red/46/valverde_et_al.pdf
Vázquez-Cano E., Ferrer Delgado D. (2015) La creación de videojuegos con Scratch en Educación Secundaria. Communications Papers Media Literacy y Gender Studies 4 (6), 63-73.
Yarden H., Yarden A. (2013) Learning and Teaching Biotechnology Methods Using Animations. En D.F. Treagust, C.Y. Tsui (Eds.) Multiple Representations in Biological Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education (pp 93-108). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_6