L'analyse de genres textuels à des fins légales: de nouvelles applications de la pragmatique dans la société
Auteurs
- Roser Giménez García (ES) Universitat de Barcelona - Laboratorio SQ-Lingüistas Forenses
- Garazi Jiménez Aragón (ES) Universidad del País Vasco - Laboratorio SQ-Lingüistas Forenses
- Sheila Queralt (ES) Laboratorio SQ-Lingüistas Forenses
Résumé
Cet article rassemble des études innovantes récentes qui s’occupent de l'analyse des genres textuels à partir de séquences rhétoriques (Swales, 1990) et évaluent leur application potentielle au domaine légal. Les résultats montrent que l'application de théories pragmatiques à des typologies de textes judiciaires telles que les conversations abusives (Chiang et Grant, 2017), les condamnations judiciaires (Le, King- kui y Ying-Long,2008) ou les lettres d'indulgence (Mason, 2011) permettent d’accroître de manière significative la connaissance de ces textes. L’étude des séquences rhétoriques permet de déterminer la structure attendue dans un genre textuel et d'améliorer les techniques d'investigation légale telles que la dissimulation d'identité ou les méthodologies pour déterminer la fausseté d'une note de suicide ou encore la nature idéologique d'un discours. Cette étude se veut une première étape dans l’adaptation de ce type de recherche au contexte espagnol ainsi qu’une contribution à l’amélioration de l’administration de la justice en Espagne.
Mots-clés
Téléchargements
Comment citer
Licence
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Références
ABAALKHAIL, A. (2015). Rhetorical Moves in an Occluded Genre: A Qualitative Analysis of Suicide Notes. [Tesis de máster]. Carleton University.
ABELEN, E., et al. (1993). “The rhetorical structure of US-American and Dutch fund-raising letters”, Text, 13(3), pp. 323-350.
ARUNDALE, R. B. (2006). “Face as relational and interactional: A communication framework for research in face, facework, and politeness”, Journal of Politeness Research, 2, pp. 193-216.
ASKEHAVE, I. y SWALES, J. M. (2001). “Genre Identification and Communicative Purpose: A Problem and A Possible Solution”, Applied Linguistics, 22(2), pp. 195-212.
BARGIELA-CHIAPPINI, F., y HARRIS, S. J. (1996). “Requests and status in business correspondence”, Journal of Pragmatics, 28, pp. 635-62.
BHATIA, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Essex: Pearson Education.
BIBER, D., et al. (2007). Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
BLACK, P. J., et al. (2015). “A linguistic analysis of grooming strategies of online child sex offenders: Implications for our understanding of predatory sexual behaviour in an increasingly computer-mediated world”, Child Abuse and Neglect, 44, pp. 140-149.
BROWN, G. y YULE, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BROWN, P. y LEVINSON, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BUNTON, D. (2005). “The structure of PhD conclusion chapters”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), pp. 207-224.
CARMODY, E. (2017). “Move maps: A move analysis of chatroom grooming interactions” [Abstract]. The First Annual Centre for Forensic Linguistics (CFL) Symposium Cybercrime: Language and Identities Online. Publicación electrónica: http://docplayer.net/23785380-The-first-annual-centre-for-forensic-linguistics-cfl-symposium-cybercrime-language-and-identities-online-programme.html (fecha de consulta 12/01/2018)
CHAKORN, O. (2006). “Persuasive and politeness strategies in cross-cultural letters of request in the Thai business context”, Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 16(1), pp. 106-146.
CHIANG, E. y GRANT, T. (2017). “Online grooming: moves and strategies”, Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito, 4(1), pp. 103-141.
CONNOR, U. y UPTON, T. A. (2003). “Linguistic dimensions of direct mail letters”, Meyer, C. y Leistyna, P. (eds.): Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 71-87.
COTOS, E., et al. (2015). “Furthering and applying move/step constructs: Technology-driven marshalling of Swalesian genre theory for EAP pedagogy”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, pp. 52-72.
GIBBONS, J., y TURELL, M. T. (eds.). (2008). Dimensions of forensic linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing.
GRANT, T. (2007). “Quantifying evidence in forensic authorship analysis”, International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, 14(1), pp. 1-25.
GRANT, T. y MACLEOD, N. (2016). “Assuming identities online: experimental linguistics applied to the policing of online paedophile activity”, Applied linguistics, 37(1), pp. 50-70.
HENRY, A. y ROSEBERRY, R. L. (2001). “A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: ‘Letter of Application’”, English for Specific Purposes, 20, pp. 153-167.
HASAN, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
JIMÉNEZ ARAGÓN, G. y QUERALT ESTEVEZ, S. (2017). “Forensic linguistic analysis for the identification of political parties in the Basque Country”, Book of Abstracts of 13th Biennial Conference of the International Association of Forensic Linguists, (Porto, julio 2017), pp. 52-53. Porto: University of Porto.
JOSEPH, R., et al. (2014). “Communicative moves in forestry research introductions: Implications for the design of learning materials”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, pp. 53-69.
LE, C., et al. (2008). “Contrastive analysis of Chinese and American court judgments”, US-China Law Review, 5, pp. 49-58.
MASON, M. (2011). “Examining the rhetorical structure and discursive features of letters of leniency as a genre”, Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 21(1), pp. 111-125.
MORENO, A. I. y SUÁREZ, L. (2008). “A study of critical attitude across English and Spanish academic book reviews”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), pp. 15-26.
O’CONNELL, R. (2003). A typology of cyber sexploitation and online grooming practices. Preston, England: Cyberspace Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire. Publicación electrónica: http://netsafe.org.nz/Doc_Library/racheloconnell1.pdf. (fecha de consulta: 9 enero 2018).
OLSSON, J. (2004). Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language, Crime and the Law. London/New York: Continuum.
PRECHT, K. (1998). “A cross-cultural comparison of letters of recommendation”, English for Specific Purposes, 17(3), pp. 241-265.
SALAGER-MEYER, F. et al. (2007). “Collegiality, critique and the construction of scientific argumentation in medical book reviews: A diachronic approach”, Journal of Pragmatics, 39(10), pp. 1758-1774.
SCHEGLOFF, E. (1990). “The organization of sequences as a source of coherence in talk-in-interaction”, Dorval, B. (ed.), Conversational organization and its development, Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, pp. 51-77.
SHAPERO, J. J. (2011). The language of suicide notes. [Tesis doctoral]. University of Birmingham.
SWALES, J. M. (1981). Aspects of Article Introductions: Aston ESP Research Reports No. 1. Birmingham: Language Studies Unit, Aston University.
SWALES, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SWALES, J. (1996). “Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter”: Ventola, E. y Mauranen, A. (eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 45-58.
SWALES, J. y FEAK, C. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
TORRE, L. y BENDIXEN, M. A. (1988). Direct Mail Fund Raising: Letters that Work. New York: Plenum Press.
TURELL, M. T. (Investigadora principal). (2012-2015). Hacia la consolidación de un índice de similitud/distancia idiolectal (IS/DI) en idiolectometria forense (FFI2012-34601). Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
UPTON, T. A. (2002). “Understanding direct mail letters as a genre”, Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7(1), pp. 65-85.
WILLIAMS, R., et al. (2013). “Identifying sexual grooming themes used by internet sex offenders”, Deviant Behavior, 34(2), pp. 135-152.