MODEL PCC: constructive participation and collaborative online

Número

Downloads

Article abstract page views:  449  

Info

Monographic
41-54
Published: 01-11-2014

Authors

  • M. Beatrice Ligorio (IT) Universidad degli Studi di Bari
  • F. Feldia Loperfido (IT) Universidad degli Studi di Bari

Abstract

This paper describes a model for developing online teaching courses in order to obtain an active and constructive participation by college students. The model, named Constructive and Collaborative Participation (CCP) considers learning as a co-construction of knowledge and intends to bring students closer to develop new ideas by performing products either individual or group work. For that purpose, it is envisaged to do alternative individual and group activities, always with the aim of making build products. In that way, the potential of collaborative and constructive interaction of network and the different possibilities of online work is used. The model has been created in different college courses. Firstly, it will be presented describing the theories taken as inspiration; then, the online activities and, finally, some analyzes that demonstrate its effectiveness.

Keywords

Online training courses, activity system, participation, social constructivism, distributed knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Ligorio, M. B., & Loperfido, F. F. (2014). MODEL PCC: constructive participation and collaborative online. Hachetetepé. Scientific Journal of Education and Communication, (9), 41–54. Retrieved from https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/hachetetepe/article/view/6256

References

Anderson, T., y Shattuck, J. (2012). “Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research?” Educational Researcher, 41 (1); 16-25.

Aronson, E., y Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom(2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Londres: Chandler.

Brown, A. L., y Campione, J. C. (1990). “Communities of learning or a context by any other name”.En Kuhn, D. (Ed.), Contributions to human development, 21; 108-126.

Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of Education. Harvard University Press.

Cole, M. (1990). “Cultural Psychology: A once and future discipline?”. In J. J. Berman (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1989: Cross-cultural perspectivas. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press; 132-161.

Cole, M. (1995). “From Cross-Cultural to Cultural psychology”. Swiss Journal of Psychology – Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie – Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 54 (4); 262-276.

Cole, M. (1996). CulturalPsychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit.

Gergen, K. J. (1985). “The social constructionist movement in modern psychology”. American psychologist, 40 (3); 266-275.

Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. Londres: Sage.

Gergen, K. J. (2001). “Psychological science in a postmodern context”. American Psychologist, 56; 803-813.

Hakkarainen, K. (2003). “Progressive inquiry in a computer-supportedbiologyclass”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 40, 10; 1072–1088.

Hutchins, E. (2001). “Distributed cognition”. In Smelser, N. J. y. Baltes, P. B (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2068–2072.

Impedovo, M. A., Ritella, G., y Ligorio, M. B. (2013). “Developing Codebooks as a New Tool to Analyze Students’ ePortfolios”. International Journal of ePortfolio, Vol. 3, 2; 161-176.

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lave, J., y Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lecusay, R., Rossen, L., y Cole, M. (2008). “Cultural-historical activity theory and the zone of proximal development in the study of idioculture”. Cognitive Systems Research, 9; 92-103.

Ligorio, M. B., Cacciamani, S. y Cesareni, D. (2006). Blended Learning: dalla scuola dell’obbligo alla formazione adulta. Roma: Carocci.

Ligorio, M.B., y Veermans, M. (2005). “Perspectives and patterns in developing and implementing international web-based Collaborative Learning Environments”. Computers & Education, 45, 3; 271-275.

Palincsar, A. S., y Brown, A. L. (1984). “Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities”. Cognition and Instruction, 1 (2); 117-175.

Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality. Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. In J.E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences. Leicester: BritishPsychological Society; 136-178.

Scardamalia, M. y Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.). Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press; 97-118.

Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., y Valcke, M. (2005). “The impact of role assignment on knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups: a multilevel analysis”. Small Group Research, 36; 704-745.

Shotter, J. (1993). Cultural Politics of Everyday Life: Social Constructionism, Rhetoric, and Knowing of the Third Kind. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Topping, K. (2005). “Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology”. 25 (6); 631–45.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1929). “The problem of the cultural development of the child”. II. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 34; 414–434.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.