Aprendizagem independente de inglês por estudantes universitários usando TIC: uma abordagem de modelagem de equações estruturais
Downloads
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Hachetetepe.2024.i29.2205Informação
Autores
- Tubagus Zam Zam Al Arif (ID) Universitas Jambi
- Urip Sulistiyo (ID) Universitas Jambi
- Sri Wachyunni (ID) Universitas Jambi
Resumo
O crescimento das tecnologias de informação e comunicação (TIC) pode potencializar a aprendizagem independente de línguas pelos alunos. Esta pesquisa teve como objetivo examinar os fatores que influenciam essa aprendizagem com o uso das TIC. Um projeto quantitativo foi realizado com a participação de 1.022 estudantes de inglês em nove universidades da Indonésia. Para a coleta de dados, foram utilizados questionários, e a análise foi realizada por meio da técnica PLS-SEM. Os resultados indicaram que as atitudes dos alunos mediam a influência de fatores como ICTSE, OCSE, FC e SN na aprendizagem autodirigida com TIC (SDLLICT). Os achados revelaram que a atitude dos alunos é a variável mais significativa para melhorar a aprendizagem de línguas de forma autodirigida. Esses resultados são valiosos tanto para alunos quanto para educadores, pois ressaltam a importância de um conhecimento adequado sobre TIC e uma atitude positiva em relação ao seu uso nas atividades de aprendizagem de inglês. Além disso, os professores devem possuir habilidades em TIC para oferecer experiências de aprendizagem personalizadas. A pesquisa também apresenta implicações importantes para educadores e formuladores de políticas no que diz respeito à criação de infraestruturas de TIC que atendam às necessidades dos estudantes.
Palavras-chave
Downloads
Como Citar
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Tubagus Zam Zam Al Arif, Urip Sulistiyo, Sri Wachyunni
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Os autores que publicaram com esta revista, aceitam os seguintes termos:
1. Manterão seus direitos autorais e garantirão à revista o direito à primeira publicação de seu trabalho, que estará simultaneamente sujeita à Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons. Podem ser copiados, utilizados, divulgados, transmitidos e exibidos publicamente, desde que a autoria, url e revista sejam citados, e não sejam utilizados para fins comerciais. Nenhuma obra derivada é permitida.
2. Podem adotar outros contratos de licença não exclusiva para a distribuição da versão publicada da obra (por exemplo, depositá-la em arquivo telemático institucional ou publicá-la em volume monográfico), desde que seja indicada a publicação inicial nesta revista.
3. Divulgue seu trabalho pela Internet (por exemplo, em arquivos telemáticos institucionais ou em seu site) uma vez que o manuscrito seja aceito, o que pode levar a trocas interessantes e ao aumento das citações do trabalho publicado. (Veja O efeito do acesso aberto).
Hachetetepé. A revista científica de educação e comunicação não cobra taxa pela submissão de manuscritos ou pela publicação de seus artigos.
Referências
Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring Students’ Use of Zoom Application in Language Course Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4), 883–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1
Arif, T. Z. Z. A, Sulistiyo, U., Ubaidillah, M. F., Handayani, R., Junining, E., & Yunus, M. (2022). A Look at Technology Use for English Language Learning from a Structural Equation Modeling Perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 23(2), 18–37.
Arif, T. Z. Z. A, Kurniawan, D., Handayani, R., Hidayati, & Armiwati. (2024). EFL university students’ acceptance and readiness for e-learning: a structural equation modeling approach. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 22(1), 1–16. www.ejel.org
Artman, B., & Crow, R. S. (2022). Instructional technology integration and self-directed learning: A dynamic duo for education. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 19(1), 30–44.
Bosch, C., Mentz, E., & Goede, R. (2019). Self-directed learning: A conceptual overview. In Self-Directed Learning for the 21st Century: Implications for Higher Education (pp. 1–36). AOSIS.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2019.BK134.01
Chau, K. Y., Law, K. M. Y., & Tang, Y. M. (2021). Impact of Self-Directed Learning and Educational Technology Readiness on Synchronous E-Learning. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 33(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.20211101.oa26
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Creswell, J.W., 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th edn. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Damrow, A. L., & Faye, T. P. El. (2022). I had to change: empowering students through self-study research. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 19(1), 17–29.
Dogham, R. S., Elcokany, N., Ghaly, A., Dawood, T. M. A., Aldakheel, F. M., Llaguno, M. B. B., & Mohsen, D. M. (2022). Self-directed learning readiness and online learning self-efficacy among undergraduate nursing students. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 17, 100490. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJANS.2022.100490
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L.,
Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on
opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy.
International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Fisher, M., King, J., & Tague, G. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21(7), 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0589
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103
Hadiyanto, H., Failasofah, F., Armiwati, A., Abrar, M., & Thabran, Y. (2021). Students’ practices of 21st century skills between conventional learning and blended learning. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.3.7
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hamidi, H., & Chavoshi, A. (2019). Social, individual, technological and pedagogical factors influencing mobile learning acceptance in higher education: A case from Iran. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 133–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.09.007
Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practices of structural equation modelling 4th edition. In Methodology in the social sciences.
Lai, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2022). University students’ use of mobile technology in self-directed language learning: Using the integrative model of behavior prediction. Computers and Education, 179, 104413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104413
Marín-Díaz, V., & Sampedro, B. (2023). View of digital competence the university student. Hachetetepé. Revista Científica de Educación y Comunicación, 26. https://doi.org/10.25267/hachetetepe.2023.i26.1102
Mentz, E., & Bailey, R. (2019). A systematic review of research on the use of technology-supported cooperative learning to enhance self-directed learning. In Self-Directed Learning for the 21st Century: Implications for Higher
Education (1st ed., pp. 203–238). AOSIS. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2019.BK134.07
Mentz, E., Beer, J. De, & Bailey, R. (2019). Self-Directed Learning for the 21st Century: Implications for Higher Education (1st ed., Vol. 1). AOSIS. https://doi.org/10.4102/aosis.2019.bk134.01
Pan, X. (2020). Technology Acceptance, Technological Self-Efficacy, and Attitude Toward Technology-Based Self-Directed Learning: Learning Motivation as a Mediator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.564294
Pan, X., & Shao, H. (2020). Understanding factors influencing EFL students’ technology-based self-directed learning. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 6(4), 450–459. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.781472
Park, K.-Y., Sung, T.-S., & Joo, C.-W. (2018). On the Relationship between College Students’ Attitude toward the Internet and their Self-directed English Learning Ability. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 23(2), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2018.23.02.117
Payne, S. (2021). Using an e-portfolio system to evaluate student learning outcomes and to foster more self- direction within the curricula. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 18(1), 1–9.
Rahim, M. N., & Chandran, S. S. C. (2021). Investigating EFL Students’ Perceptions on E-learning Paradigm-Shift During Covid-19 Pandemic. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 3(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v3i1.5949
Sulistiyo, U., Zam, T., Al Arif, Z., Handayani, R., Ubaidillah, M. F., & Wiryotinoyo, M. (2022). Determinants of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Towards ICT Use for English Language Learning. Journal of Language and Education, 8(2), 18-31 https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2022.12467
Sumuer, E. (2018). Factors related to college students’ self-directed learning with technology. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 29–43.
Tekkol, I. A., & Demirel, M. (2018). An investigation of self-directed learning skills of undergraduate students. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(NOV), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02324
Teo, T., Tan, Chee, S., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Chen, W. L., & Horn Mun, C. (2010). The self-directed learning with technology scale (SDLTS) for young students: An initial development and validation. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1764–1771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.001
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.1006/mvre.1994.1019
Yan, Y., & Singh, M. (2023). On the Educational Theory and Application of Mobile-assisted Language Learning and Independent Learning in College English Teaching. Cilt, 29(3), 137–151.
Yavuzalp, N., & Bahcivan, E. (2021). A structural equation modeling analysis of relationships among university students’ readiness for e-learning, self-regulation skills, satisfaction, and academic achievement. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00162-y
Zhang, D., & Pérez-Paredes, P. (2019). Chinese postgraduate EFL learners’ self-directed use of mobile English learning resources. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1662455
Zhou, L., Xue, S., & Li, R. (2022). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Students’ Intention to Use an Online Education Platform at a University in China. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221085259
Zhu, M., & Bonk, C. J. (2019). Designing MOOCS to facilitate participant self-monitoring for self-directed learning. Online Learning Journal, 23(4), 106–134. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2037