Convert communication. A relevance-based approach.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2000.i8.10Información
Autores/as
- Mª Carmen Merino Ferrada (ES) Universidad de Cádiz
Resumen
El objetivo fundamental de este trabajo es ofrecer un análisis de la noción de comunicación encubierta desde el marco teórico de la Teoría de la Pertinencia. Se examinan diferentes mecanismos de encubrimiento en función del tipo de estimulo empleado ostensivo o no-ostensivo, y los diferentes tipos de proceso interpretativo que estos generan.
Palabras clave
Descargas
Cómo citar
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2018 Pragmalingüística
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Citas
BACH, K. and HARNISH, R. M. (1979). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge MA. The MIT Press.
BACH, K. and HARNISH, R. M. (1987), "Relevant questions". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10, 711-712.
BLACKBURN, S. (1984). Spreading the Word, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
CARSTON, R. (1988). "Implicature, explicature and truth-theoretic semantics". in Kempson, R. (Ed.). Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 155-181.
CLARK. H. H. (1996), Using Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
EDWARDS. D. (1997), Discourse and Cognition, London, Sage Publications.
GRICE, H. P. (1969), "Utterer's meaning and intentions". Philosophical Review 78. 147-177
POMERANTZ. A. M. (1980). "Telling my side: 'Limited access' as a fishing device". Sociological Inquiry 50, 186-198.
SCHIFFER, S. R. (1972), Meaning, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
SPERBER, D. and WILSON, D. (1982), "Mutual knowledge and relevance in theories of comprehension", in Smith. N. (Ed.), Mutual Knowledge, London. Academic Press. 61-131.
SPERBER, D. and WILSON. D. (1987), "Précis of Relevance: Communication and Cogmtion". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10, 697-754.
SPERBER, D. and WILSON, D. (1990), "Spontaneous deduction and mutual knowledge". Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, 179-184
SPERBER, D. and WILSON, D. (1986, 1995), Relevance: Coninimunication and Cognition. Oxford, Blackwell.
STRAWSON. P. F. (1964), "Intention and convention in speech acts", Philosophical Review 73. 439-460.
ΤΑΝΑΚΑ, Κ. (1989). The Language of Advertising: A Pragmatic Approach, London. University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies. Ph. D. Thesis.
ΤΑΝΑΚΑ, Κ. (1994), Advertising Language: A Pragmatic Approach to Advertisements in Britain and Japan, London, Routledge.
WILLIAMSON, J. (1978). Decoding Advertisements. Ideology and Meaning in Advertising. London. Marion Boyars Publishers.
WILSON, D. (1994), "Relevance and understanding", in Brown. G., Malmkjær, K., Pollitt. A. and J. Williams (eds.). Language and Understanding, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 37-58.
WILSON, D. and SPERBER, D. (1993). "Linguistic form and relevance", Lingua 90, 1- 25.
ŽEGARAC. V. and CLARK, B. (1999), "Phatic interpretations and phatic communication". Journal of Linguistics 35, 321-346.