Possibilities of autonomous learning in secondary students for image creation using artificial intelligence

Número

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25267/Hachetetepe.2025.i30.1201

Info

Articles
1201
Published: 17-01-2025
PlumX

Authors

Abstract

This pilot study investigates the ability of 83 secondary school students to use AI image generation tools autonomously, using Stable Diffusion software. Participants created images from textual prompts, iteratively improving them over a 55-minute session. Results showed increases in scores for improved prompts, particularly in identifying and describing physical and emotional elements, though the effect size was from very small to moderate. Lexical entropy did not change significantly, indicating limited creativity and adaptability in prompts. It concludes that students need teacher support to improve prompt quality and effectively utilize AI in educational settings.

Keywords


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Saz-Pérez , F., Lizana Carrió , A., Pizà-Mir , B., & de Benito Crosetti , B. (2025). Possibilities of autonomous learning in secondary students for image creation using artificial intelligence. Hachetetepé. Scientific Journal of Education and Communication, (30), 1201. https://doi.org/10.25267/Hachetetepe.2025.i30.1201

Author Biographies

Fabio Saz-Pérez , Universitat de les Illes Balears

Bachelor’s degree in Biology and Biochemistry, with two master’s degrees in Neurosciences and Teacher Training. With more than 10 years of teaching experience in secondary education, covering various scientific subjects, and 6 years of ICT coordination. Currently, he is a tenured civil servant for the Department of Education of the Balearic Islands. In the academic-research field, he is a PhD candidate in Educational Technology and has participated in projects introducing new technologies in the classroom, as well as in Primary Education and Pedagogy. He collaborates with the National University of Patagonia Austral (UNPA) in Argentina as a lecturer in the Master’s in Education in Virtual Environments.

Alexandra Lizana Carrió , Universitat de les Illes Balears

Bachelor’s degree in Pedagogy (Specializing in School Pedagogy), Master’s in Educational Technology: E-Learning and Knowledge Management, and Doctor in Educational Technology: Virtual Learning and Knowledge Management. She is part of the Department of General Didactics and Educational Theories as a lecturer at CESAG, teaching courses in the degrees of Primary Education and Early Childhood Education. She is also part of the Department of Applied Pedagogy and Educational Psychology at the UIB.

Bartolomé Pizà-Mir , Universitat de les Illes Balears

Bachelor’s degree in Pedagogy (Specializing in School Pedagogy), Master’s in Educational Technology: E-Learning and Knowledge Management, and Doctor in Educational Technology: Virtual Learning and Knowledge Management. She is part of the Department of General Didactics and Educational Theories as a lecturer at CESAG, teaching courses in the degrees of Primary Education and Early Childhood Education. She is also part of the Department of Applied Pedagogy and Educational Psychology at the UIB.

Bárbara de Benito Crosetti , Universitat de les Illes Balears

Bachelor’s degree in Pedagogy and Doctor in Educational Sciences from the University of the Balearic Islands (UIB). She is a professor in the Department of Applied Pedagogy and Educational Psychology at the UIB, teaching subjects on Educational Technology in the Pedagogy degree. She worked as a senior technician in the UIB's distance education service, Campus Extens (1997-2007), and as an associate professor (1999-2007). She has experience in undergraduate, postgraduate, and trainer training at the national and international levels. A member of the Educational Technology Group (GTE) since 1992, she has participated in research projects, material design, and virtual training environments. Her research areas include tools and platforms for online training, videoconferencing in teaching, the design of didactic materials, teaching strategies in virtual environments, and knowledge and learning management systems

References

Arvidsson, S., y Axell, J. (2023). Prompt engineering guidelines for LLMs in Requirements Engineering. https://acortar.link/NJ5vCu

Brade, S., Wang, B., Sousa, M., Oore, S., y Grossman, T. (2023, October). Promptify: Text-to-image generation through interactive prompt exploration with large language models. arXiv preprints. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.09337

Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., ... y Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprints. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165

Chai, C. S., Koh, J. h. L., y Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63-73.

Chang, L.-H., y Ginter, F. (2024). Automatic Short Answer Grading for Finnish with ChatGPT. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38(21), 23173-23181. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i21.30363

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition. LEA.

Cózar, R., Zagalaz, J., y Sáez, J. M. (2015). Creating digital curricular contents of Social Sciences for Primary

Education. A TPACK experience for future teachers. Educatio Siglo XXI, 33(3), 147-167. http://doi.org/10.6018/j/240921

de Benito Crosetti, B., y Salinas Ibáñez, J. M. (2016). La Investigación Basada en Diseño en Tecnología Educativa. RiiTE Revista interuniversitaria de investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 0, 44-59.

https://doi.org/10.6018/riite2016/260631

de Kok, T. (June 2024). ChatGPT for Textual Analysis? How to use Generative LLMs in Accounting Research. SSRN. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4429658

Dehouche, N., y Dehouche, K. (2023). What's in a text-to-image prompt? The potential of stable diffusion in visual arts education. Heliyon, 9(6), e16757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16757

Duan, Y., Edwards, J. S.,Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. International journal of information management, 48, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... y Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

Ekin, S. (2023). Prompt engineering for ChatGPT: a quick guide to techniques, tips, and best practices. TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.22683919.v2

Ennis, R.H. (2019). Long definition of critical thinking. CriticalThinking.net. https://acortar.link/XqoRsP

García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). La percepción de la Inteligencia Artificial en contextos educativos tras el lanzamiento de ChatGPT: disrupción o pánico. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 24, e31279. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279

Giray, L. (2023). Prompt engineering with ChatGPT: a guide for academic writers. Annals of biomedical engineering, 51(12), 2629-2633.

Hao, Y., Chi, Z., Dong, L., y Wei, F. (2022). Optimizing prompts for text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09611

Herman, D. (2022, December 9th). The End of High-School English. The Atlantis. http://bit.ly/3Xhmle1

Jukiewicz, M. (2024). The future of grading programming assignments in education: The role of ChatGPT in

automating the assessment and feedback process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101522

Lara, L. R., Diaz, C. E., Palomeque, A. L. V., y Toloza, E. A. (2020). Introducción del concepto de entropía en el proceso de interacción de materiales en educación a distancia. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Universidad Nacional de Catamarca.

Latif, E., y Zhai, X. (2024). Fine-tuning chatgpt for automatic scoring. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100210

Liu, V., y Chilton, L. B. (2022, April). Design guidelines for prompt engineering text-to-image generative models. arXiv preprints. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.06977

Llorens-Largo, F., y ChatGPT. (2022, 22 de diciembre). Cavilaciones invernales. Universídad. http://bit.ly/3XGk0Jn

Madison, J. (2004). James Madison Critical Thinking Course. Seaside, CA: The Critical Thinking Co. https://acortar.link/Z78Utz

Manassero-Mas, M. A., y Vázquez-Alonso, Á. (2020). Evaluación de destrezas de pensamiento crítico: Validación de instrumentos libres de cultura. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED, (47), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.17227/ted.num47-9801

Marche, S. (2022, December 6th). The College Essay Is Dead. Nobody is prepared for how AI will transform academia. The Atlantis. http://bit.ly/3iEoPEd

McTear, M. F., Callejas, Z., y Griol, D. (2016). The conversational interface. Springer.

Meckler, L., y Verma, P. (2022). Teachers are on alert for inevitable cheating after the release of ChatGPT. The Washington Post. https://acortar.link/vp6T7h

Mindner, L., Schlippe, T., Schaaff, K. (2023). Classification of Human- and AI-Generated Texts: Investigating Features for ChatGPT. En Schlippe, T., Cheng, E.C.K., Wang, T. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education Technologies: New

Development and Innovative Practices. AIET 2023. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies (Vol 190, pp.152-170). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7947-9_12

OpenAI. (2024a). ChatGPT [Custom large language model]. https://chat.opeanai.com/chat

OpenAI. (2024b). Diagrams & Data: Research, Analyze, Visualize (GPT-4) [Custom large language model]. OpenAI. https://acortar.link/6RYLj4

Oppenlaender, J. (2023). A taxonomy of prompt modifiers for text-to-image generation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(15), 3763–3776. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2286532

Paul, R. y Nosich, G.M. (2019). A Model for the National Assessment of Higher Order Thinking. Critical Thinking.org. https://acortar.link/aWjiLp

Pavlichenko, N., y Ustalov, D. (2023, July). Best prompts for text-to-image models and how to find them. arXiv preprints. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.11711

Phan, H.P. (2010). Critical thinking as a self-regulatory process component in teaching and learning. Psicothema, 22, 284-292.

Pinto, G., Cardoso-Pereira, I., Monteiro, D., Lucena, D., Souza, A., y Gama, K. (2023, September). Large language models for education: Grading open-ended questions using chatgpt. arXiv preprints. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.16696

Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., y Sutskever, I. (2019). Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8), 9.

Rebollo-Catalán, A., y Vico-Bosch, A. (2014). El apoyo social percibido como factor de inclusión digital de las mujeres de entorno rural en las redes sociales virtuales. Comunicar, 43(22), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.3916/C432014-17

Ropek, L. (2023, 4 enero). New York City Schools Ban ChatGPT to Head Off a Cheating Epidemic. Gizmodo. http://bit.ly/3kp8Ha9

Sahoo, P., Singh, A. K., Saha, S., Jain, V., Mondal, S., y Chadha, A. (2024). A systematic survey of prompt engineering in large language models: Techniques and applications. arXiv preprints. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.07927

Saz-Pérez, F., y Pizà-Mir, B. (2024a). Desafiando el estado del arte en el uso de ChatGPT en educación en el año 2023. REIRE Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, 17(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1344/reire.44018

Saz-Pérez, F. y Pizà-Mir, B. (2024b). Needs and perspectives on the integration of generative artificial intelligence in Spanish educational context. UTE Teaching y Technology (Universitas Tarraconensis), (2), e3803. https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2024.3803

Saz-Pérez, F., Pizá-Mir, B., y Lizana Carrió, A. (2024). Validación y estructura factorial de un cuestionario TPACK en el contexto de Inteligencia Artificial Generativa (IAG). Hachetetepé. Revista científica de Educación y Comunicación, (28), 1101. https://doi.org/10.25267/Hachetetepe.2024.i28.1101

Serban, I. V., Sordoni, A., Bengio, Y., Courville, A. C., y Pineau, J. (2017). A hierarchical latent variable encoder-decoder model for generating dialogues. arXiv preprints. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.06069

Shannon, C. E., y Weaver, W. (1948). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.

Sorensen, T., Robinson, J., Rytting, C. M., Shaw, A., Rogers, K., Delorey, A., Khalil, M., Fulda, N., y Wingate, D. (2022). An Information-theoretic Approach to Prompt Engineering Without Ground Truth Labels. arXiv preprints.

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.11364

Stokel-Walker, C. (2022, December 9th). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays should professors worry? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7

Sun, S., Zhang, C., Huang, L., y Li, J. (2019). Context-aware response generation for multi-turn conversation with deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Access, 7, 49918-49927.

Tapalova, O., y Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Education: AIEd for Personalised Learning Pathways. European Journal of ELearning, 18(5), 361-373. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.5.2597

The Jamovi Project (2022). Jamovi. (Versión 2.3) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org.

Torres-díaz, J. C., y Infante-Moro, A. (2011). Digital divide in universities: Internet use in Ecuadorian universities.

Comunicar, 19(37), 81- 88. https://doi.org/10.3916/C37-2011-02-08

White, J., Fu, Q., Hays, S., Sandborn, M., Olea, C., Gilbert, H., ... y Schmidt, D. C. (2023). A prompt pattern catalog to enhance prompt engineering with chatgpt. arXiv preprints. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.11382

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., y Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27.