The golden mean: A systems biology approach to language disorders
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2020.iextra2.02Info
Authors
- Antonio Benítez Burraco (ES) Universidad de Sevilla
Abstract
Current clinical typologies of language disorders are mostly based on symptomatic criteria. Nonetheless, they often fail to categorize and characterize patients unambiguously, essentially because of the widespread problems of comorbidity and heterogeneity. Likewise, they usually fail to incorporate etiological factors in a distinctive way, particularly, what we have learnt in the last decades about the genetic causes of neurodevelopmental conditions. Ultimately, these shortcomings are expected to impact negatively on therapies and the recovery of patient’s abilities. This paper argues in favour of a systems biology approach to language disorders, which pays attention to the way in which the myriad of the biological factors involved (at the bottom) interact complexly to regulate language development and processing (at the surface). In particular, it argues for a classification of disorders based on intermediate-level components, like brain oscillations.
Keywords
Downloads
How to Cite
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
ARNOLD, S. J., PFRENDER, M. E. & JONES, A. G. (2001): “The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution”, Genetica, 112-113, pp. 9-32.
BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A. & MURPHY, E. (2016): “The oscillopatic nature of language deficits in autism: from genes to language evolution”, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, p. 120.
BOYLE, E. A. et al. (2017): “An expanded view of complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic”, Cell, 169, pp. 1177-1186.
ERWIN, D. H. (2017): “The topology of evolutionary novelty and innovation in macroevolution”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372, 20160422.
JIMÉNEZ-BRAVO, M. et al. (2017): “An oscillopathic approach to developmental dyslexia: from genes to speech processing”, Behavioural Brain Research, 329, pp. 84-95.
KITANO, H. (2002): “Computational systems biology”, Nature, 420, pp. 206-210.
MEYER, L. (2018): “The neural oscillations of speech processing and language comprehension: state of the art and emerging mechanisms”, European Journal of Neuroscience, 48, pp. 2609-2621.
MOULTON, D. E. et al. (2015): “The morpho-mechanical basis of ammonite form”. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 364, pp. 220-230
MURPHY, E. (2016): “Evolutionary monkey oscillomics: generating linking hypotheses from preserved brain rhythms”. Theoretical Linguistics, 42, pp. 117-137
MURPHY, E. & BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A. (2016): “Bridging the gap bet¬ween genes and language deficits in schizophrenia: an oscillopathic approach”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 422.
MURPHY, E. & BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A. (2017): “Language deficits in schizophrenia and autism as related oscillatory connectomopathies: an evolutionary account”. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 83, pp. 742-764.
MURPHY, E. & BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A. (2018a): “Toward the language oscillogenome”, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1999.
MURPHY, E. & BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A. (2018b): “Paleo-oscillomics: inferring aspects of Neanderthal language abilities from gene regulation of neural oscillations”, Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 96, pp. 111-124.
POEPPEL, D. & EMBICK, D. (2005): “Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience”, Cutler, A. (ed.): Twenty-first Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 103-120.
PORT, R. G. et al. (2015): “Prospective MEG biomarkers in ASD: pre-clinical evidence and clinical promise of electrophysiological signatures”, Yale Journal of Biological Medicine, 88, pp. 25-36.
RAPIN, I. & ALLEN, D. A. (1983): “Developmental language disorders: nosologic considerations”, Kirk, U. (ed.): Neuropsychology of Language, Reading and Spelling, New York: Academic Press, pp. 155-184.