Paradigma pragmático-funcional en la rehabilitación de la afasia

Número

Descargas

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo:  1327  

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2020.iextra2.12

Información

Artículos
199-215
Publicado: 03-09-2020
PlumX

Autores/as

Resumen

Durante las últimas dos décadas, la investigación sobre la rehabilitación de la afasia ha desarrollado una visión pragmática y funcional del lenguaje, lo que ha llevado a una orientación cada vez más multifacética del trabajo terapéutico. En este enfoque de la rehabilitación de la afasia convergen diferentes programas concebidos de forma independiente, centrando la terapia en la dimensión relacional del lenguaje, que incluye: las interrelaciones funcionales entre los componentes del sistema lingüístico; la función comunicativa y el uso del lenguaje en contextos naturales como en las conversaciones cotidianas; las interrelaciones entre el comportamiento verbal y otros medios semióticos como la gestualidad; y las interrelaciones entre el lenguaje y otras habilidades cognitivas. Estos precedentes pueden ser considerados en conjunto para esbozar un nuevo paradigma para la rehabilitación de la afasia.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

Hernández Sacristán, C., & Rosell Clari, V. (2020). Paradigma pragmático-funcional en la rehabilitación de la afasia. Pragmalingüística, (2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2020.iextra2.12

Citas

ALI, M. et al. (2013): “More outcomes than trials: A call for consistent data collection across stroke rehabilitation trials”, International Journal of Stroke, 8, pp. 18-24.

ARMSTRONG, E. & FERGUSON, A. (2010): “Language, meaning, context, and functional communication”, Aphasiology, 24, pp. 480-496.

BARKLEY, R. A. (1997): “Behavioural inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD”, Psychological Bulletin, 121, pp. 65-94.

BRADY M. C. et al. (2012): “Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke”, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, Art. No.: CD000425.

BRADY, M. C. et al. (2014): “Time for a step change? Improving the efficiency, relevance, reliability, validity and transparency of aphasia rehabilitation research through core outcome measures, a common data set and improved reporting criteria”, Aphasiology, 28, pp. 1385-1392.

CARTER, A.; CONNOR, L. y DROMERICK, A. (2010): “Rehabilitation after stroke: Current state of science”, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 10, pp. 158-166.

FRANCIS, D. R.; CLARK, N. & HUMPHREY, G. W. (2002): “Circumlocution-induced naming. A treatment for effecting generalisation in anomia?”, Aphasiology, 16, pp. 234-259.

FRANKEL, T. & PENN, C. (2007): “Perseveration and conversation in TBI: Response to pharmacological intervention”, Aphasiology, 21, pp. 1039-1078.

FRANKEL, T.; PENN, C. & ORMOND-BROWN, D. (2007): “Executive dysfunction as an explanatory basis for conversation symptoms of aphasia: A pilot study.” Aphasiology, 21, pp. 814-828.

GALLARDO PAÚLS, B. y HERNÁNDEZ SACRISTÁN, C. (2013): Lingüística clínica. Un enfoque funcional sobre las alteraciones del lenguaje, Madrid: Arco Libros.

GOODWIN, C. (1995): “Co-constructing meaning in conversation with an aphasic man”, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, pp. 233-260.

GOODWIN, C. (2000): “Pointing and the collaborative construction of meaning in aphasia”, Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium About Language and Society, Austin: University of Texas, pp. 67-76.

HALLIDAY, M. A. K. (1978): Language as a Social Semiotic: Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, London: Edward Arnold

HELM-ESTABROOKS, N. & ALBERT, M. L. (1991): Manual of Aphasia Therapy, Austin TX: PRO-ED.

HELM-ESTABROOKS, N. & ALBERT, M. L. (2003): Manual of Aphasia and Aphasia Therapy, Austin TX: PRO-ED.

HERNÁNDEZ SACRISTÁN, C. (2019): “Anomia: Una perspectiva enaccionista sobre la incapacidad de acceso a las unidades léxicas”, Pruñonosa-Tomás, M. (ed.): Lenguaje, paisaje lingüístico y enacción, Valencia, Tirant Humanidades, pp. 261-275.

HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C.; ROSELL-CLARI, V. & MACDONALD, J. E. (2011): “Proximal and distal. Rethinking linguistic form and use for clinical purposes”, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25, pp. 37-52.

HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. et al. (2012): “On natural metalinguistic abilities in aphasia. A preliminary study”, Aphasiology, 26, pp. 199-219.

HOCKETT, C. (1960): “The origin of speech”, Scientific American, 203, pp. 88-96.

HOLLAND, A. (1979): “Some practical considerations in aphasia rehabilitation”, Sullivan, M. y Kommers, M. (eds.): Rationale for adult aphasia therapy, Omaha: University of Nebraska Medical Center, pp. 167-180.

HOLLAND, A. (1980): Communicative Abilities in Daily Living: A test of functional communication for adults, Baltimore: University Park Press.

HOLLAND, A. (1991): “Pragmatic aspects of intervention in aphasia”, Journal of Neurolinguistics, 6, pp. 197-211.

JOHNSON, M. L. et al. (2014): “An Enhanced Protocol for Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy II: A Case Series”, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23, pp. 60-72.

KAGAN, A. (1998): “Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: methods and resources for training conversational partners”, Aphasiology, 12, pp. 816-830.

KAGAN, A. et al. (2001): “Training volunteers as conversation partners using Supported conversation for adults with aphasia (SCA): A controlled study”, Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, pp. 624–638.

MCNEIL, M. R. et al. (1995): “Behavioral and pharmacological treatment of lexical-semantic deficits in a single patient with primary progressive aphasia”, American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 4, pp. 76-87.

PENN, C. et al. (2010): “Executive function and conversational strategies in bilingual aphasia”, Aphasiology, 24 (2), pp. 288-308.

PERKINS, M. (2000): “The scope of pragmatic disability. A cognitive approach”, Müller, N. (ed): Pragmatics in Speech and Language Pathology: Studies in Clinical Applications, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 6-28.

ROSE, M. (2006): “The utility of arm and hand gestures in the treatment of aphasia”, Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 8, pp. 92-109.

ROSE, M. & DOUGLAS, J. (2003): “Limb apraxia, pantomime, and lexical gesture in aphasic speakers: preliminary findings”, Aphasiology, 17, pp. 453-464.

ROSELL-CLARI, V. y HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2014): MetAphAs. Protocolo de Exploración de Habilidades Metalingüísticas en la Afasia, Valencia: NauLlibres.

ROSELL-CLARI, V. & HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2017): “Anomia rehabilitation viewed from a pragmatic-functional paradigm. A case study”, Revista de Investigación en Logopedia, 7, pp. 47-70.

ROSELL-CLARI, V. & HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2018a): MetAphAs. Metalanguage in Aphasia Assessment, Valencia: NauLlibres (Libro electrónico en Google books).

ROSELL-CLARI, V. & HERNÁNDEZ-SACRISTÁN, C. (2018b): “Aphasiarehabilitationfrom a pragmatic-functionalparadigm. A comparative study of two patients with different performance profiles in natural metalinguistic tasks”, Aphasiology, 32 (S1), pp. 50-51.

ROSELL-CLARI, V. & VALLES-GONZÁLEZ, B. (2016): “Theory of Mind (ToM) and language: stimulating metalinguistic skills in people with dementia”, RevistaCoDAS, 28, pp. 252-260.

SALTER, K. L. et al. (2007): “Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation”, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 86, pp. 1007-1012.

SANDT-KOENDERMAN M. E., MEULEN I. & RIBBERS G. M. (2012): “Aphasia rehabilitation: more than treating the language disorder”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93 (1), pp. 1-3.

SARNO, M. T. (1969): The Functional Communication Profile: Manual of directions, New York: Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine.

SIMMONS-MACKIE, N. et al. (2010): “Communication Partner Training in Aphasia: A Systematic Review”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, pp. 1814-1837.

SPENCER, K. A. et al. (2000): “Examining the facilitative effects of rhyme in a patient with output lexical damage”, Aphasiology, 14, pp. 567-584.

TOMASELLO, M. (2003): Constructing a Language. A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978): Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

WILKINSON, R. & WIELAERT, S. (2012): “Rehabilitation targeted at everyday communication: Can we change the talk of people with aphasia and their significant others within conversation?”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93 (1), pp. 70-76.