Vaccine conspiracy beliefs and some factors influencing them: a study with secondary school students
Downloads
- PDF (Español (España)) 566
- EPUB (Español (España)) 34
- VISOR (Español (España))
- MÓVIL (Español (España))
- XML (Español (España)) 30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2024.v21.i2.2101Info
Authors
- Valeriano Bellver Ribelles (ES) Departament de Didàctica de les Ciències Experimentals i Socials. Universitat de València https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-5053
- Joan Josep Solaz-Portolés (ES) Departament de Didàctica de les Ciències Experimentals i Socials. Grup CDC. Universitat de València https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4690-6556
- Vicente Sanjosé López (ES) Departament de Didàctica de les Ciències Experimentals i Socials. Grup CDC. Universitat de València https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-1717
Abstract
The goals of this research focused on the assessment of vaccine conspiracy beliefs and the impact of trust in science, knowledge about the nature of science, grade level and gender on them. A quantitative ex post facto cross-sectional research was conducted. A total of 301 students (148 girls and 153 boys) from three different grades of Spanish secondary education (8th, 9th, and 11th grades, between 13 and 17 years old) participated in this study. A questionnaire on vaccine conspiracy beliefs, a questionnaire on trust in science, and a questionnaire on nature of science, were administered to participants. Scores obtained and correlation, multiple regression, and mediation analyses suggest that: a) a) students' beliefs about vaccines were generally quite satisfactory, and gender had no significant effect on them; b) the variable that most influenced the variability of these beliefs was trust in science; and c) trust in science played a mediating role between knowledge about the nature of science and grade level, and beliefs, which showed the indirect and significant effects of both variables on these beliefs.
Keywords
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Valeriano Bellver Ribelles, Joan Josep Solaz-Portolés, Vicente Sanjosé López
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Require authors to agree to Copyright Notice as part of the submission process. This allow the / o authors / is non-commercial use of the work, including the right to place it in an open access archive. In addition, Creative Commons is available on flexible copyright licenses (Creative Commons).
Reconocimiento-NoComercial
CC BY-NC
References
Allington, D., Duffy, B., Wessely, S., Dhavan, N., y Rubin, J. (2021). Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency: corrigendum. Psychological Medicine, 51(10), 1770. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721000593
Balastegui M., Palomar R., y Solbes J. (2020) ¿En qué aspectos es más deficiente la alfabetización científica del alumnado de Bachillerato? Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 17(3), 3302. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2020.v17.i3.3302
Baron, R. M., y Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bensley, D. A., Lilienfeld, S. O., Rowan, K. A., Masciocchi, C. M., & Grain, F. (2020). The generality of belief in unsubstantiated claims. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3581
Biddlestone, M., Azevedo, F., y van der Linden, S. (2022). Climate of conspiracy: A meta-analysis of the consequences of belief in conspiracy theories about climate change. Current Opinion in Psychology, 46, 101390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101390
Biddlestone, M., Green, R., Cichocka, A., Sutton, R., y Douglas, K. (2021). Conspiracy beliefs and the individual, relational, and collective selves. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(10), e12639. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12639
Cadena-Nogales, P. D., Solaz-Portolés, J. J., Echegoyen-Sanz, Y., y Sanjosé-López, V. (2022). Level of Acceptance of Epistemically Unwarranted Beliefs in Pre-Service Primary School Teachers: Influence of Cognitive Style, Academic Level and Gender. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(3), 398-407. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.351
Cassese, E. C., Farhart, C. E., y Miller, J. M. (2020). Gender differences in COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs. Politics & Gender, 16(4), 1009-1018. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000409
Cislak, A., Marchlewska, M., Wojcik, A. D., Śliwiński, K., Molenda, Z., Szczepańska, D., y Cichocka, A. (2021). National narcissism and support for voluntary vaccination policy: The mediating role of vaccination conspiracy beliefs. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 701-719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220959451
Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., y Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004
Díaz, N., Jiménez-Liso, M. R. (2012). Las controversias sociocientíficas: temáticas e importancia para la educación científica. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 9(1), 54-70 http://hdl.handle.net/10498/14624
Díaz, N. (2019). Caracterizando controversias sociocientíficas en la prensa escrita. Una herramienta para el desarrollo de la alfabetización científica. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 16 (1), 1102 https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2019.v16.i1.1102
Đorđević, J. M., Mari, S., Vdović, M., y Milošević, A. (2021). Links between conspiracy beliefs, vaccine knowledge, and trust: Anti-vaccine behavior of Serbian adults. Social Science & Medicine, 277, 113930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113930
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., y Cichocka, A. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., y Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Galliford, N., y Furnham, A. (2017). Individual difference factors and beliefs in medical and political conspiracy theories. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(5), 422-428. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12382
Garrett, R. K., y Weeks, B. E. (2017). Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation. PloS One, 12(9), e0184733. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184733
Georgiou, N., Delfabbro, P., y Balzan, R. (2019). Conspiracy beliefs in the general population: The importance of psychopathology, cognitive style, and educational attainment. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109521
Goreis, A., y Voracek, M. (2019). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Psychological Research on Conspiracy Beliefs: Field Characteristics, Measurement Instruments, and Associations with Personality Traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
Hairida, H. (2016). The effectiveness using inquiry based natural science module with authentic assessment to improve the critical thinking and inquiry skills of junior high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 209-215. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i2.7681
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
Issit, M. (2012). Conspiracy theories: An overview. In P. McCaffrey (Ed.), Conspiracy theories (pp. 7–10). H. W. Wilson.
Kossowska, M., Szwed, P., y Czarnek, G. (2021). Ideology shapes trust in scientists and attitudes towards vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 720-737. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211001946
Kroke, A. M., y Ruthig, J. C. (2022). Conspiracy beliefs and the impact on health behaviors. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 14(1), 311-328. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12304
Lantian, A., Bagneux, V., Delouvée, S., y Gauvrit, N. (2021). Maybe a free thinker but not a critical one: High conspiracy belief is associated with low critical thinking ability. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(3), 674-684. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3790
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science education, 84(1), 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
Newheiser, A. K., Farias, M., y Tausch, N. (2011). The functional nature of conspiracy beliefs: Examining the underpinnings of belief in the Da Vinci Code conspiracy. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 1007-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.011
Nadelson, L., Jorcyk, C., Yang, D., Jarratt Smith, M., Matson, S., Cornell, K., y Husting, V. (2014). I just don't trust them: the development and validation of an assessment instrument to measure trust in science and scientists. School Science and Mathematics, 114(2), 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12051
Pivetti, M., Melotti, G., Bonomo, M., y Hakoköngäs, E. (2021). Conspiracy beliefs and acceptance of COVID-vaccine: An exploratory study in Italy. Social Sciences, 10(3), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10030108
Sanmarchi, F., Gibertoni, D., Golinelli, D., Gori, D., Fantini, M. P., y Scheier, L. M. (2023). Trust in science, medicine and medical providers and its relations to vaccine beliefs: A latent class analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948221134187
Shapiro, G. K., Holding, A., Perez, S., Amsel, R., y Rosberger, Z. (2016). Validation of the vaccine conspiracy beliefs scale. Papillomavirus Research, 2, 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2016.09.001
Sharp, D. (2008). Advances in conspiracy theory. The Lancet, 372, 1371–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61570-6
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723
Sturgis, P., Brunton-Smith, I., y Jackson, J. (2021). Trust in science, social consensus, and vaccine confidence. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(11), 1528-1534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01115-7
Torres, N., y Solbes, J. (2016). Contribuciones de una intervención didáctica usando cuestiones sociocientíficas para desarrollar el pensamiento crítico. Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, 34(2), 43-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1638
Uskola, A., Burgoa, B., Maguregi, G. (2018) Influencia de la ayuda del profesorado en la construcción del modelo de sistema inmunológico y su aplicación en las tomas de decisión. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 15 (3), 3604 https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2018.v15.i3.3604
Uskola A., Burgoa B. y Maguregi G. (2021) Integración del conocimiento científico en la argumentación sobre temas científicos. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 18(1), 1101https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i1.1101
van Prooijen, J.W. (2017). Why education predicts decreased belief in conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3301
Virtič, M. P. (2022). Teaching science & technology: components of scientific literacy and insight into the steps of research. International Journal of Science Education, 44(12), 1916-1931. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2105414
Wartono, W., Hudha, M. N., y Batlolona, J. R. (2017). How are the physics critical thinking skills of the students taught by using inquiry-discovery through empirical and theorethical overview? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(2), 691-697. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80632
Weisberg, D. S., Landrum, A. R., Hamilton, J., y Weisberg, M. (2021). Knowledge about the nature of science increases public acceptance of science regardless of identity factors. Public Understanding of Science, 30(2), 120-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520977700
Wood, M. J. (2016). Some dare call it conspiracy: labeling something a conspiracy theory does not reduce belief in it. Political Psychology, 37, 695–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12285
Zhang, X., Guo, Y., Zhou, Q., Tan, Z., y Cao, J. (2021). The mediating roles of medical mistrust, knowledge, confidence and complacency of vaccines in the pathways from conspiracy beliefs to vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines, 9(11), 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111342