Cognitive load and mixed reality (augmented and virtual)
![Número](https://revistas.uca.es/public/journals/45/cover_issue_560_es_ES.jpg)
Downloads
- PDF (Español (España)) 256
- EPUB (Español (España)) 22
- VISOR (Español (España))
- MÓVIL (Español (España))
- XML (Español (España)) 6
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Hachetetepe.2023.i27.2206Info
Abstract
Technological progress has led to the emergence of cutting-edge tools that enrich the physical environment by incorporating virtual elements. In the field of education, this technological immersion offers learning experiences that guarantee greater optimisation in the acquisition of knowledge through a lower cognitive load. These technologies have the capacity to create and add information developed in virtual environments, which gives them a high level of control and knowledge of the real world. In this context, the concept of Extended Reality (ER) arises, which would encompass both Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR). The present research originates from the project The Metaverse: Extended Reality (Virtual and Augmented) in Higher Education: Design, Production, Evaluation and Training of Extended Reality Programmes for University Education (MEREVIA). The main objective is to explore the educational reality in relation to the use of ER and to address the various circumstances that may arise when integrating these technologies into educational practice. To this end, various data collection and analysis strategies, both quantitative and qualitative, will be applied. In addition, different phases of design, production and evaluation of learning objects in different areas of knowledge will be carried out.
Keywords
Downloads
Supporting Agencies
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Julio Cabero-Almenara , Carmen Llorente- Cejudo , Lorena Martín-Párraga
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have published with this journal, accept the following terms:
- They will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right to first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License . They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that the authorship, url, and magazine are cited, and are not used for commercial purposes. No derivative works are allowed.
- They may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Disseminate your work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on your website) once the manuscript is accepted, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
Hachetetepé. Scientific journal of education and communication does not charge a fee for the submission of manuscripts or for the publication of its articles.
References
Abich IV, J., Parker, J., Murphy, J. S. y Eudy, M. (2021). A review of the evidence for training effectiveness with virtual reality technology. Virtual Reality, 25(4), 919-933.
Albus, P., Vogt, A. y Seufert, T. (2021). Signaling in virtual reality influences learning outcome and cognitive load. Computers & Education, 166, 104154.
Aroca- Reyes, C., y Llorente- Cejudo, C. (2023). Design, construction and validation of a rubric to measure motivation in Early Childhood Education with the use of Augmented Reality. Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 9(1), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2023.v9i1.14237
Ausín- Villaverde, V., Rodríguez- Cano, S., Delgado- Benito, V., y Bogdan Toma, R. (2023). Evaluación de una APP de realidad aumentada en niños/as con dislexia: estudio piloto. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (66), 87-111.
Bautista, L., Maradei, F. y Pedraza, G. (2023). Strategies to reduce visual attention changes while learning and training in extended reality environments. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 17(1), 17-43.
Brown, M., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Brook, D. C., Grajek, S., Alexander, B., Weber, N., Bali, M., Bulger, S., Dark, S., Engelbert, N., Gannon, K., Gauthier, A., Gibson, D., Gibson, R., Lundin, B., Veletsianos, G. y Weber, N. (2020). 2020 educause horizon report teaching and learning edition (pp. 2-58). Educause.
Cabero- Almenara, J., Valencia-Ortiz, R. y Llorente-Cejudo, C. (2022). Ecosystem of emerging technologies: augmented, virtual and mixed reality. Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación, 23, 7-22. https://doi.org/10.51302/tce.2022.1148
Cabero- Almenara, J., y Llorente- Cejudo, C. (2023). Tecnologías y metodologías emergentes. En C.LL. Cejudo y J.G. Castillo (Eds.), Tecnologías emergentes y pedagogía de la innovación (pp. 11-24). Dykinson.
Cabero-Almenara, J., Llorente-Cejudo, C., Palacios-Rodríguez, A. y Gallego-Pérez, Ó. (2023a). Degree of Acceptance of Virtual Reality by Health Sciences Students. Students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20, 5571.
Cabero-Almenara, J., De-La-Portilla-De-Juan, F., Barroso-Osuna, J. y Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2023b). Technology-Enhanced Learning in Health Sciences: Improving the Motivation and Performance of Medical Students with Immersive Reality. Applied Sciences, 13(14), 8420.
Campos- Soto, M., Navas-Parejo, M. y Moreno- Guerrero, A. (2020). Realidad virtual y motivación en el contexto educativo: Estudio bibliométrico de los últimos veinte años de Scopus. Alteridad. Revista de educación, 15(1), 47-60.
Castro-Meneses, L. J., Kruger, J. L. y Doherty, S. (2020). Validating theta power as an objective measure of cognitive load in educational video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 181-202.
Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation (2017). Cognitive load theory: Research that teachers really need to understand. Sydney: Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation.
Chandler, P. A., Ayres, P. L. y Kirschner, P. (2011). Contemporary cognitive load theory research: the good, the bad and the ugly.
Chang, Y. S., Chou, C. H., Chuang, M. J., Li, W. H. y Tsai, I. F. (2023). Effects of virtual reality on creative design performance and creative experiential learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1142-1157.
Di Natale, A. F., Repetto, C., Riva, G. y Villani, D. (2020). Immersive virtual reality in K‐12 and higher education: A 10‐year systematic review of empirical research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2006-2033.
Díaz, E., Rubio, S., Martín, J. y Luceño, L. (2010). Estudio Psicométrico del Índice de Carga Mental
NASA-TLX con una Muestra de Trabajadores Españoles. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizacionesm 26(3), 191-199.
Figueroa, J., Huffman, L., y Rosa Dávila, E. (2021). Fusionando la realidad aumentada en la educación bilingüe y ESL: Percepciones de futuros maestros. Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 7(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2021.v7i1.9823
Fromm, J., Radianti, J., Wehking, C., Stieglitz, S., Majchrzak, T. A. y vom Brocke, J. (2021). More than experience? On the unique opportunities of virtual reality to afford a holistic experiential learning cycle. The Internet and higher education, 50, 100804.
Fussell, S. G. y Truong, D. (2021). Accepting virtual reality for dynamic learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18.
Howard, M. C., Gutworth, M. B., y Jacobs, R. R. (2021). A meta-analysis of virtual reality training programs. Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106808.
Kamińska, D., Sapiński, T., Wiak, S., Tikk, T., Haamer, R. E., Avots, E. y Anbarjafari, G. (2019). Virtual reality and its applications in education: Survey. Information, 10(10), 318.
Klepsch, M. y Seufert, T. (2020). Understanding instructional design effects by differentiated measurement of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Instructional Science, 48(1), 45-77.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Bossu, C., Charitonos, K., Coughlan, T., Ferguson, R., FitzGerald, E. y Whitelock, D. (2022). Innovating pedagogy 2022: exploring new forms of teaching, learning and assessment, to guide educators and policy makers.
Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van Gog, C. y Van der Vleuten, J. (2014). Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 30, 32-42.
Makransky, G., Petersen, G. B. y Klingenberg, S. (2020). Can an immersive virtual reality simulation increase students’ interest and career aspirations in science? British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2079-2097.
Maradei- García, F. M., Rojas, L. E. B. y Pedraza, G. (2023). Carga cognitiva y esfuerzo mental durante el cambio de contexto en entornos de realidad aumentada con fines de aprendizaje procedimental: Cognitive load and mental effort during context switching in augmented reality environments for procedural learning purposes. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (68), 305-340.
Marín-Díaz, V., Sampedro, B. E., y Vega Gea, E. (2022). Promoting learning through use of 360º videos. Innoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation, 8(2), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2022.v8i2.15120
Menjivar, E., Sánchez, E., Ruíz Palmero, J., y Linde, T. (2021). Revisión de la producción científica sobre la realidad virtual entre 2016 y 2020 a través de Scopus y WoS. EDMETIC, 10(2), 26–55.
Mulders, M., Buchner, J. y Kerres, M. (2020). A framework for the use of immersive virtual reality in learning environments. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(24), 208-224.
Naismith, L. M., Cheung, J. J., Ringsted, C. y Cavalcanti, R. B. (2015). Limitations of subjective cognitive load measures in simulation‐based procedural training. Medical education, 49(8), 805-814.
Park, S. M. y Kim, Y. G. (2022). A metaverse: Taxonomy, components, applications, and open challenges. IEEE access, 10, 4209-4251.
Pernett- Cárdenas, M. (2018). Carga cognitiva en la lectura de hipertexto. Zona Próxima, (28), 42-56.
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J. y Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive
virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778.
Rauschnabel, P. (2022). What is Augmented Reality Marketing? Its definition, complexity, and future. Journal of Business Research, 142.
Reid, GB. y Nygren, TE. (1988). The subjective workload assessment technique: a scaling procedure for measuring mental workload. En: Hancock PA, Meshkati N, editores, Human mental workload. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 185-218.
Reyes-Ruiz, G. (2022). La realidad aumentada como una tecnología innovadora y eficiente para el aprendizaje de idiomas en un modelo pedagógico Flipped Learning. Pixel-Bit: Revista de Medios y Educación, 65, 7-36.
Rolo- González, G., Díaz- Cabrera, D. y Hernández Fernaud, E. (2009). Desarrollo de una escala subjetiva de carga mental de trabajo (ESCAM). Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 25(1), 29-37.
Sepp, S., Howard, S. J., Tindall-Ford, S., Agostinho, S. y Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive load theory and human movement: Towards an integrated model of working memory. Educational Psychology
Review, 31, 293-317.
Singh, G., Mantri, A., Sharma, O. y Kaur, R. (2021). Virtual reality learning environment for enhancing electronics engineering laboratory experience. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 229-243.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. y Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational psychology review, 31, 261-292
Tang, Y. M., Au, K. M., Lau, H. C., Ho, G. T., y Wu, C. H. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of learning design with mixed reality (MR) in higher education. Virtual Reality, 24(4), 797-807.
Toala- Palma, J., Mera, J., Loor, J. y Vergara, M. I. S. (2020). La Realidad Virtual como herramienta de innovación educativa. EPISTEME KOINONIA: Revista Electrónica de Ciencias de la Educación, Humanidades, Artes y Bellas Artes, 3(5), 270-286.
Valdés, J. C., y Rueda, C. (2023). El trabajo colaborativo en los EDIT, explorando el aprendizaje inmersivo en el metaverso. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia, 23(73).
Vásquez- Carbonell, M., y Silva-Ortega, J. I. (2020). Tendencias y características de la realidad virtual: Una revisión de la literatura entre los años 2017 y 2018. Computer and Electronic Sciences: Theory
and Applications, 1(1), 36-70.
Vergara, D., Antón-Sancho, Á., Extremera, J. y Fernández-Arias, P. (2021). Assessment of virtual reality as a didactic resource in higher education. Sustainability, 13(22), 12730.
Wang, Y. Y. & Chuang, Y. W. (2023). Investigating the potential adverse effects of virtual reality-based learning system usage: from UTAUT2 and PPVITU perspectives. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-20.
Yu, Z. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effect of virtual reality technology use in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-21.