Dysarthria from the interaction between speech therapy and acoustic phonetics. Monitoring and rehabilitation to obtain a “functional voice”

Número

Downloads

Article abstract page views:  1561  

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2020.iextra2.04

Info

Papers
70-88
Published: 03-09-2020
PlumX

Authors

  • Carmen Castillo Requena (ES) Hospital Universitario Puerto Real (Cádiz)
  • María Dolores Muñoz Núñez (ES) Universidad de Cádiz

Abstract

This paper aims to show the benefits of two methods commonly used in speech therapy for, among other pathologies, dysarthria. It also wants to emphasize that, when the speech therapist undertakes a rehabilitation work, he does not look for a normal voice but a “functional voice”. We understand by functional those that allows the person an adequate performance in different communicative situations. At the same time, we show that acoustic analysis is revealed as the most objective measurement tool of rehabilitation progress in dysarthria. In contrast to what has been done so far, in which only the pitch of a vowel is taken into account, we present -from some practical cases- the analysis of other parameters, such as the frequency of the other harmonics, amplitude and time, which provide us with very relevant data on the progression of the melodic curve and speech of the patient in general.

Keywords


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Castillo Requena, C., & Muñoz Núñez, M. D. (2020). Dysarthria from the interaction between speech therapy and acoustic phonetics. Monitoring and rehabilitation to obtain a “functional voice”. Pragmalingüística, (2), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2020.iextra2.04

References

ARONSON, A. E. (1990): Clinical voice disorders. An interdisci-plinary approach, New York: Thieme Inc.

CANNITO, M. & MARQUARDT, T. P. (1997): “Ataxia dysarthria”, McNeil, M. R. (ed.): Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders, New York: Thieme Inc., pp. 217-249.

COBETA, I. et al. (2013): “Voz normal y clasificación de las disfo-nías”, Patología de la voz (Po-nencia oficial de la SEORL y PCF), Barcelona: Ed. Marge médica books, pp. 237-242.

DARLEY, F. L. et al. (1975): Audio seminars in speech pathology: Motor speech disorders, Phila-delphia: WB Saunders, pp. 268-275.

DUFFY, J. R. (2005): Motor speech disorders: substrates, differen-tial diagnosis, and manage-ment, Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, pp. 379-443.

LAUKKANEN, A. M. (1992): “About the so called ‘‘resonance tubes’’ used in Finnish voice training practice. An electro-glottographic and acoustic in-vestigation on the effects of this method on the voice qual-ity of subjects with normal voice”, Scandinavian Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, 17 (4), pp. 151-161.

LLAU ARCUSA, M. J. y GONZÁLEZ ÁLVAREZ, J. (2004): “Medida de la inteligibilidad en el habla disártrica”, Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 24 (1), pp. 33-43.

MELLE, N. (2003): “Disartria en el daño cerebral adquirido: hacia un método global de evaluación”, Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 23 (1), pp. 20-29.

MELLE, N. (2007a): Guía de intervención logopédica en la disartria, Madrid: Síntesis.

MELLE, N. (2007b): “Intervención logopédica en la disartria”, Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 27 (4), pp. 187-197.

MELLE, N. (2012): “Disartria. Práctica basada en la evidencia y guías de práctica clínica”, Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología, 32, pp. 120-133.

MOORE, J. P. (1971): Organic voice disorders, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

NÚÑEZ-BATALLA, F. et al. (2007): “Adaptación y validación del índice de incapacidad vocal (VHI-30) y su versión abreviada (VHI-10) al español”, Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española, 58 (9), pp. 386-392.

PANKAS, J. et al. (2011): “Importance of correct therapeutic proce-dure selection in voice recovery”, Coll Antropol, 35 (2), pp. 259-262.

QUILIS, A. (1981): Fonética acústica de la lengua española, Madrid: Gredos.

SELLARS, C. et al. (2007). “Terapia del habla y del lenguaje para la disartria por daño cerebral no progresivo”, La Biblioteca Cochrane Plus, 4, Oxford: Update Software Ltd.

STORY, B. et al. (2000): “Acoustic impedance of an articially lengthened and constricted vocal tract”, J Voice, 14 (4), pp. 455-469.

TITZE, I. (2006): “Voice training and therapy with a semi- occluded vocal tract: rationale and scientific underpinnings”, J Speech Lang Hear Res., 49 (2), pp. 448–459.

TITZE, I. & LAUKKANEN, A. (2007): “Can vocal economy in phonation be increased with an artificially lengthened vocal tract? A computer modeling study”, Logoped Phoniatr Vocol, 32 (4), pp. 147-156.

WORRAL, L. E. (2000): “A concpetual framework for a functional ap-proach to acquired neurogenic disordres of communication and swallowing”, Worral, L. E. & Frattali, C. M. (eds.): Neuro-genic Communication Disorderes: a functional approach, New York: Thieme, pp. 3-39.