A possible way to naturalize the human soul

Número

Downloads

Article abstract page views:  443  

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2009.i17.03

Info

Papers
40-51
Published: 01-12-2009
PlumX

Authors

  • José Luis Guijarro Morales (ES) Universidad de Cádiz

Abstract

One of the most basic linguistic principles (or parameters, according to some) is used to point to a likely necessary (though, probably, not sufficient) condition of human uniqueness (i.e. being able to speak, communicate complex messages, have religious feelings, indulge in art and humour, and so on) which has been conceptualised either as the fact that we have human souls, in religious contexts, or human minds, in other contexts.

Keywords


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Guijarro Morales, J. L. (2009). A possible way to naturalize the human soul. Pragmalingüística, (17), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.25267/Pragmalinguistica.2009.i17.03

References

Arouet, J.-M. (Voltaire) (1964). Dictionnaire Philosophique Paris: Garnier-Flammarion.Dictionnaire Philosophique Portatif. 1764.

Boyer, P. (2001). Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Curçó, C. (1995). “Some Observations on the Pragmatics of Humorous Interpretation: A Relevance Theoretic Approach”; in Working Papers in Linguistics # 7. London: UCL.

(1996). “The Implicit Expression of Attitudes, Mutual Manifestedness, and Verbal Humour”; in Working Papers in Linguistics # 8. London: UCL.

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.

Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. London: Penguin.

(1996). Kinds of Minds: Toward an Understanding of Consciousness. New York: Basic Books.

Droit, R.-P. & D. Sperber (1999). Des Idées qui viennent. Paris: Odile Jacob.

Fodor, J. (1983). Modularity of Mind. Boston, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Hauser, M.D., N. Chomsky & T. Fitch (2002). “The Faculty of Language: What It Is, Who Has It and How Did It Evolve?”; in Science Compass. Review (<http://www.chomsky.info/articles/20021122.pdf>).

Hornstein, N. (1981). “The Study of Meaning in Natural Language”; in Hornstein, N. & D. Lightfood (eds.) 1981: 116-151.

Hornstein, N. & D. Lightfoot (eds) (1981). Explanations in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. London: Longman.

Radford, A. (1988). Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sperber, D. (1974). Le symbolisme en général. Paris: Hermann.

(1997). “Intuitive and reflective beliefs”; in Mind and Language 12 (1) 1997: 67-83.

(1999). “Naturaliser l’esprit”; dans Droit, R-P. & D. Sperber (eds.): 11-24.

Sperber, D. & D. Wilson (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.