Critical digital reading: analytical-methodological contributions
Downloads
- PDF (Español (España)) 249
- EPUB (Español (España)) 27
- VISOR (Español (España))
- MÓVIL (Español (España))
- XML (Español (España)) 4
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25267/Hachetetepe.2022.i25.2202Info
Authors
- Concepción López-Andrada (ES) Universidad de Extremadura https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9423-0434
Abstract
This paper reviews didactic experiences and interventions developed in recent years whose object of study is digital reading understood as a key concept that circulates across disciplines and diverse geographies. The research reviewed presents tensions and potentialities around the notions of critical literacy, reading competence and digital scenarios from analytical-methodological perspectives. The methodology applied in this article is based on the bibliographic documentary analysis carried out with the MAXQDA software, which allows the collection of data and evidence around a series of intersections. The provisional conclusions point to the fact that technology-mediated reading as a field of study is articulated from unprecedented formats of approaching knowledge where contexts and reading objectives are multiplied, incorporating selective and fragmented reading practice as a fundamental strategy for analysis. Finally, this article proposes as a future line of research the interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary analysis of reading. For this reason, it will be necessary to extend the frameworks of the field of study of critical digital literacy and investigate the potential of new interpretative communities, reading ecosystems and spaces for socialization.
Keywords
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Concepción López-Andrada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those authors who have published with this journal, accept the following terms:
- They will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right to first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License . They may be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that the authorship, url, and magazine are cited, and are not used for commercial purposes. No derivative works are allowed.
- They may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., deposit it in an institutional telematic archive or publish it in a monographic volume) provided that the initial publication in this journal is indicated.
- Disseminate your work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional telematic archives or on your website) once the manuscript is accepted, which may lead to interesting exchanges and increased citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access).
Hachetetepé. Scientific journal of education and communication does not charge a fee for the submission of manuscripts or for the publication of its articles.
References
Afflerbach, P., Pearson, D. y Paris, S. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1
Ajideh, P. (2003). Schema theory-based pre-reading tasks: A neglected essential in the ESL reading class. The reading matrix, 3(1), 1-14. https://bit.ly/3tD3tJp
Alonso-Arévalo, J., y Cordón-García, J. A. (2014). Lectura Social, metadatos y visibilidad de la información. [Comunicación en XLV Jornadas Mexicanas de Biblioteconomía], Monterrey, México. http://eprints.rclis.org/23095/
Bahloul, J. (2002). Lecturas precarias. Estudio sociológico sobre los "poco lectores". Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Beltrán, M. (1985). Cinco vías de acceso a la realidad social. Reis, (29), 7-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/40183084
Benhabib, S. (2005). Borders, boundaries, and citizenship. PS: Politial Science and Politics, 38(4), 673-677. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096505050328
Bombini, G. (2008). La lectura como política educativa. Revista iberoamericana de educación, 46(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie460714
Buder, J., Schwind, C., Rudat, A., y Bodemer, D. (2015). Selective reading of large online forum discussions: The impact of rating visualizations on navigation and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44(0), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.043
Canclini, N. G. (2001). Culturas híbridas estrategias para entrar y salir de la modernidad. Paidós.
Celaya, J. (2012). Lectura social: Búsqueda, compra y lectura compartida de libros. Cuaderno digital de Libranda.
Chartier, R. (2000). Muerte o transfiguración del lector.[Comunicación en 26.º Congreso de la Unión Internacional de Editores]. Buenos Aires, Argentina. https://bit.ly/3OdqomD
Coiro, J. (2011). Predicting Reading Comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of Offline Reading Skills, Online Reading Skills, and Prior Knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11421979
Coiro, J. (2021). Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.302
Connell, R. (2014). The sociology of gender in Southern perspective. Current Sociology, 62(4), 550-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114524510
Cordero, K., Nussbaum, M., Ibaseta, V., Otaíza, M. J., Gleisner, S., González, S., Carland, C. (2015). Read Create Share (RCS): A new digital tool for interactive reading and writing. Computers & Education, 82(0), 486-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.006
Cordón-García, J. A., Fernández, J., y Olivia, A. (2015). ¿Se está transformando la lectura y la escritura en la era digital? Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 38(2), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v38n2a05
Cordón-García, J. A. (2016). La lectura en el entorno digital: nuevas materialidades y prácticas discursivas. Revista chilena de literatura, (94), 15-38. https://bit.ly/3zALKWP
De Certeau, M. (1996). La invención de lo cotidiano: artes de hacer. I (Vol. 1). Universidad iberoamericana.
Dermody, K., y Majekodunmi, N. (2011). Online databases and the research experience for university students with print disabilities. Library Hi Tech, 29(1), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831111116976
Despot, I., Ljevak Lebeda, I., y Tomašević, N. (2016). Social reading-the reader on digital margins. Libellarium: časopis za povijest pisane riječi, knjige i baštinskih ustanova, 9(1), 185-196. http://doi.org/10.15291/libellarium.v9i1.269
Fortunati, L., y Vincent, J. (2014). Sociological insights on the comparison of writing/reading on paper with writing/reading digitally. Telematics and Informatics, 31(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.02.005
García-Roca, A. (2020a). Lectura virtualmente digital: el reto colectivo de interpretación textual. Cinta de moebio, (67), 65-74. https://bit.ly/3zMrG3M
García-Roca, A. (2020b). Spanish Reading Influencers in Goodreads: Participation, Experience and Canon Proposed. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research (NAER Journal), 9(2), 153-166. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.453
Gordon, L. R. (2011). Manifiesto de Transdisciplinariedad. Para no volvernos esclavos del conocimiento de otros. Trans-pasando Fronteras, (1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.18046/retf.i1.1289
Hahnel, C., Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., y Kröhne, U. (2016). Effects of linear reading, basic computer skills, evaluating online information, and navigation on reading digital text. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 486-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.042
Jerasa, S., y Boffone, T. (2021). BookTok 101: TikTok, Digital Literacies, and Out‐of‐School Reading Practices. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 65(3),219-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1199
Jiménez, B. (1999). Investigación cualitativa en salud. Investigación cualitativa y psicología social critica. Contra la lógica binaria y la ilusión de la pureza. Investigación cualitativa en Salud, (17), 1-10.
Kaplan, N. (2016). La lectura social en España: una perspectiva sociopragmática. Álabe, (13), 1-21. http://doi.org/10.15645/Alabe2016.13.7
Keck, D., Kammerer, Y., y Starauschek, E. (2015). Reading science texts online: Does source information influence the identification of contradictions within texts? Computers & Education, 82(0), 442-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.005
Knutsson, O., Blåsjö, M., Hållsten, S., y Karlström, P. (2012). Identifying different registers of digital literacy in virtual learning environments. Designing teaching and learning in technology enhanced learning environments - Nordic interdisciplinary perspectives, 15(4), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.002
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.
Larrosa, J. (2006). Sobre la experiencia. Aloma. Revista de Psicologia i Ciències de l'Educació, (19), 87-112. https://bit.ly/3mQiOCK
Lee, Y.-H., y Wu, J.-Y. (2013). The indirect effects of online social entertainment and information seeking activities on reading literacy. Computers & Education, 67, 168-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.03.001
Leliana, A., Harti, L. M. S., Zuhri, F., y Kusumaningtyas, D. C. S. (2021). Digital Literacy: Text Credibility on Critical Reading
Material. JET ADI BUANA, 6(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.36456/jet.v6.n01.2021.3512
Letchumanan, M., y Tarmizi, R. A. (2010). Utilization of e-book among University Mathematics Students. International Conference on Mathematics Education Research 2010 (ICMER 2010), 8, 580-587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.080
Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., y Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement Gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.85
Levratto, V., Suminas, A., Schilhab, T., y Esbensen, G. (2021). Smartphones: reading habits and overuse. A qualitative study in Denmark, Lithuania and Spain. Educación XX1, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.28321
Li, W., Mao, Y., y Zhou, L. (2021). The Impact of Interactivity on User Satisfaction in Digital Social Reading: Social Presence as a Mediator. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(17), 1636-1647. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1898850
Lim, H. J., y Jung, H. (2019). Factors related to digital reading achievement: A multi-level analysis using international large-scale data. Computers & Education, 133, 82-93. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.007
Macevičiūtė, E., y Manžuch, Z. (2018). Conceptualising the role of digital reading in social and digital inclusion. Proceedings of ISIC: the Information Behaviour Conference, 23(4), 1-11. https://bit.ly/3NWJfm5
Mangen, A., Olivier, G., y Velay, J. L. (2019). Comparing comprehension of a long text read in print book and on Kindle: Where in the text and when in the story? Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00038
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., y Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58(0), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
Merchant, G. (2021). Reading with technology: the new normal. Education, 49(1), 96-106, https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1824705
Michelson, K., y Dupuy, B. (2018). Teacher learning under co-construction: Affordances of digital social annotated reading. Alsic. Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d'Information et de Communication, 21, https://doi.org/10.4000/alsic.3344
Moya, C., y Gerber, M. M. (2016). La lectura en formatos digitales en el Chile actual: nuevas prácticas y viejas desigualdades. Revista chilena de literatura, (94), 59-77. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22952016000300004
Naydan, L. M. (2013). Just writing center work in the digital age: De facto multiliteracy centers in dialogue with questions of social justice. Praxis: A Writing Center Journal, 11(1), 1-7. https://bit.ly/39vkVJ8
Ocampo, A. (2018). Lectura como método. En A. Ocampo González (comp.) Enseñanza del Español como L2 en clave inclusiva. Articulaciones didácticas para la multiplicidad de diferencias (pp. 98-191). Ediciones CELEI.
Pianzola, F., Toccu, M., y Viviani, M. (2021). Readers' engagement through digital social reading on Twitter: the TwLetteratura case study. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2020-0317
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants’ part 1. On the horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://bit.ly/3b2yrnN
Salmerón, L., Cañas, J. J., Kintsch, W., y Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse
Processes, 40(3), 171-191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4003_1
Saunders, L. (2017). Connecting information literacy and social justice: Why and how. Communications in Information Literacy, 11(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.47
Sezgin, Z. Ç. (2022). Systematic analysis of digital reading studies in the digital age. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.13.9.1
Shariman, T. P. N. T., Razak, N. A., y Noor, N. F. M. (2012). Digital Literacy Competence for Academic Needs: An Analysis of Malaysian Students in Three Universities. International Conference on Education & Educational Psychology (ICEEPSY 2012), 69, 1489-1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.090
Singer, L. M., y Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. The journal of experimental education, 85(1), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794
Snyder, I. (2004). Alfabetismos digitales: Comunicación, innovación y educación en la era electrónica. Aljibe.
Solmaz, O. (2021). The Affordances of Digital Social Reading for EFL Learners: An Ecological Perspective. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 13(2), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2021040103
Songhui, Z. (2008). The influence of traditional reading habits on the construction of digital libraries in developing countries. Electronic Library, 26(4), 520-529. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470810893765
Sousa Santos, B. (2009). Una epistemología del sur: La reinvención del conocimiento y la emancipación social. Siglo XXI.
Taipale, S. (2014). The affordances of reading/writing on paper and digitally in Finland. Telematics and Informatics, 31(4), 532-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.11.003
Thoms, J. J., y Poole, F. J. (2018). Exploring digital literacy practices via L2 social reading. L2 Journal, 10(2), 36-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.11.003
Tierney, R. J. (1985). Reading strategies and practices. A compendium. Allyn and Bacon.
Turner, K. H., y Hicks, T. (2012). "That's not Writing": Exploring the Intersection of Digital Writing, Community Literacy, and Social Justice. Community Literacy Journal, 6(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/clj.2012.0000
Walsh, G. (2016). Screen and Paper Reading Research–A Literature Review. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 47(3), 160-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2016.1227661
Winch, C. (2012). For philosophy of education in teacher education. Oxford review of education, 38(3), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.693299
Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., y Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945-948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005
Zhang, S., y Duke, N. K. (2008). Strategies for internet reading with different reading purposes: A descriptive study of twelve good internet readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(1), 128-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802070491
Ziming L. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700-712. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510632040